Talk:Mustafa Barghouti
A fact from Mustafa Barghouti appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
At least parts of this article fail to meet standards of neutrality of viewpoint. First of all, the controversial part on Mustafa's relative, Marwan Barghouti, doesn't belong here - if anything it belongs into an article on Marwan, which could be linked. Stating - in an article on Mustafa - that Marwan Barghouti was "illegally arrested" by Israel portrays one viewpoint only and is an incomplete statement. The article neglects to mention that Marwan Barghouti was tried and sentenced by an Israeli court for involvement in terrorist attacks. By contrast, a separate article on Marwan Barghouti at least also cites to the charges brought by the Israeli authorities. It doesn't matter which viewpoint is correct; however, if viewpoints are presented it should be done in a balanced way, which is not the case here. Again, I think the part on Marwan should be omitted in the article on Mustafa. The article also makes a claim that Mustafa suffered injuries while in Israeli custody that were inflicted on him by Israeli security services. Given the gravity of the accusation, it requires a citation to a source. It may also require the presentation of sources attempting to rebut the claim or present a different viewpoint - if such sources exist. Generally, the article strikes me as selective on sourcing, and the references cited include only either Palestinian or Arab sources plus an interview in the New Left Review. It's certainly appropriate to cite to these sources but given how disputed all facts involving anything or anyone in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are, the credibility of the article suffers from what appears to be the presentation of one viewpoint only. To repeat it once again, I am not advocating ANOTHER viewpoint on Mustafa Barghouti, but to the extent there are controversial claims, they should be presented in a balanced fashion. Freshi 14:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
strict transliteration
The article gives in parentheses a "strict transliteration" of his name as "Muṣṭafā al-Barġūṯī". What does "strict" mean here? I assume something like "strictly following one of the Arabic transliteration methods", but there are a lot of methods, so it should at least specify which method this transliteration strictly follows. --Delirium (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Lawrence of Cyberia
What makes the Lawrence of Cyberia blog a reliable source? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the vigilance. But I think there are a few points to make for this source. 1. Wikipedia Guidelines do not require non-neutral sourcing at all times, as is the case with this site. However, more importantly, it is a Bio page from a recognized organization (its bias does not matter her) that simply lists details about a member and person heavily involved in their movement.DaltonCastle (talk) 00:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- What makes this blog a reliable source, when most blogs are not? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Diane Mason isn't a recognized organization, she's a blogger. Use of the source appears to be inconsistent with WP:BLPSPS. It should be removed/replaced. Sean.hoyland - talk 05:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mustafa Barghouti/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.B - it has some valuable information but (as I explained in my remarks in the discussion page) it unbalanced viewpoint statements and selective citations to sources. Freshi 20:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 20:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mustafa Barghouti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725000148/http://www.almubadara.org/new/edetails.php?id=320 to http://www.almubadara.org/new/edetails.php?id=320
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915121805/http://www.almubadara.org/new/english.php to http://www.almubadara.org/new/english.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)