Talk:Masterplots
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accuracy of summaries
I think there should be a section concerning the accuracy of Masterplots' summaries.
I took many English and American Literature courses at both the community college and university levels. Initially, I used the Masterplots summaries as part of my study aids the night before any exam on a literary work. I even Xeroxed the pages so I could do a quick review right before the class exam.
It was during my initial read-through of some summaries that I found errors. On my paper copies, I made the corrections so that 'my' summary copies were accurate to the actual literary work (which I had read prior to using the summaries as a quick brush-up study aid --- that's how I discovered the errors in the summaries).
After a while, while working on a Master's degree in English, I stopped using the Masterplots summaries as part of my study aids BECAUSE of all the errors I found. In fact, I got rid of my original 'encyclopedic' set and all of the yearly annuals that friends and family had given me BECAUSE of the errors.
If a Wikipedia entry is to be "complete," it must be objective and include both the good and the bad (and everything in-between).
As such, I strongly think that there should be an "Accuracy" section as part of this entry. 2600:8800:50B:6700:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 01:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Masterplots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101223021810/http://salempress.com/Store/ProdGroup/?ProductGroup.Id=19 to http://salempress.com/store/ProdGroup/?ProductGroup.Id=19
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)