Talk:Lushlife
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 20 March 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 14:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Lushlife → Lushlife (musician) – There is Bowery Electric's album of the same name (Discogs) and there is Baboon's song of the same name which is included in We Sing and Play (Discogs). I am not sure whether a primary topic exists and what it is. 153.205.50.233 (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support, no primary topic or if there is it could be the album in Gbooks. This bio-stub should be moved and the baseline redirect to other Lushlife topics on the Lush Life dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose – clear primary topic. Notability of other topics cannot be established until articles for them are created or sources are found. Right now there is nothing to compare this article to. SSTflyer 07:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry but this is exactly the opposite of what WP:DISAMBIGUATION says, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy :( In ictu oculi (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- In ictu oculi, you really shouldn't lecture other people on being familiar with the disambiguation guidelines.--Cúchullain t/c 18:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry but this is exactly the opposite of what WP:DISAMBIGUATION says, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy :( In ictu oculi (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. This appears to be the most notable topic of the title "Lushlife" (as opposed to "Lush Life"). The only other entries on the dab page are two albums and a song with no articles, and little if any coverage on any other articles. I see no evidence that any of them challenge the rapper as primary topic.--Cúchullain t/c 18:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - it's one word, the rest are all two words. Unreal7 (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 25 May 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus supporting the move. (closed by a page mover) (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Lushlife → Lushlife (musician) – There is an article about an album of the same name, Lushlife (album), which was accepted through AfC on 31 March 2016. I believe both subjects are notable, but there does not seem to be a primary topic for "Lushlife". 153.205.137.192 (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per my comments in the last identical RM two months ago. This is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation with the only other article called "Lushlife" (as opposed to "Lush Life"). Since the album article was created, the rapper has continued to get 66.2% of the page views. Even if every reader looking for the album got there by going to the musician's page first, a majority are still looking for the musician.--Cúchullain t/c 16:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.