Talk:List of supercentenarians by continent

List of Australian supercentenarians was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 November 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of supercentenarians by continent. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from List of European supercentenarians was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from List of supercentenarians from Asia was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from List of supercentenarians from Oceania was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from List of South American supercentenarians was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from List of African supercentenarians was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from List of North American supercentenarians was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Supercentenarian was copied or moved into List of supercentenarians by continent. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I assume "notable" means having a Wikipedia article, but why? None of the other lists are like that. 🇺🇦 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 10:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DerbyCountyinNZ: Florit is not used for any of the supercentenarians by country lists, by the list of the verified oldest people, or this list, and I fail to see any discussion about this method. 🇺🇦 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nor is there any agreement anywhere in Wikipedia Longevity articles, or more appropriately Wikipedia:WikiProject Longevity, (that I know of) indicating that someone should be removed just because there is no report of their death when they would otherwise be old enough to be on the list as at the date of there last report of being alive. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 11:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, really? What's this, then? 🇺🇦 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An edit made by an editor without justification according to any consensus (not their first). DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 01:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the edit (to remove her) could be justified by the fact that she was validated by the GRG at an age which would no longer qualify her for this list. And of course, one of the failings of the GRG limbo list is that there is no date given when they were last known to be alive. Unless a suitable WP:RS exists which states that she was alive at ane age which would merit her inclusion then she should not be on the list. Therefore not comparable to the Blanco case. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 02:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And, as this article is merely an off-shoot of List of the verified oldest people, the criteria there also apply here as I have noted on your earlier post which indicates the criteria according to you, not the current consensus. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 01:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Based on consensus spelled out here on the "List of the Oldest Living People" talk page, since all credible outside sources for Maria Branyas Morera cited use "Branyas" and not "Brañas," it should be spelled "Branyas" on this page too. I am mentioning this here, since there has been many reverts there on this issue, and I anticipate it potentially happening here too. Damiel (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]