Talk:King vulture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured articleKing vulture is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 2, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
January 15, 2011Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article

Looking good

Hmmm, another pleasant surprise. Prose looks good at first glance. I'll double check my greek dictionary at home and other stuff I can find. Would be good to get a bit more info on captivity bit. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

odd sentence

Umm...The vulture is sexually dimorphic, with no difference in plumage and little in size between males and females - is odd - should it be a little sexually dimorphic as there are only minor differences or some such wording? cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Wrong name

Since it has been clarifyed that vultures are not related with condors, and this bird clearly is a condor, the name "King Vulture" must be changed - eighter to "King Condor" or "(Amazon) Low Land Condor". It doesn't belong to the Falconiformes as vultures do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.249.38.77 (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity I for one would love its name to be King Condor or some other variation, hwoever wikipedia can only reflect usage not do original research. Now once bird authorities start using a different name, we'll be more than happy to review...Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

papa

I seem to recall reading somehwere that papa is a native american word...so I don't think my dictionaries are going to help too much there....cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it literally is supposed to mean "Pope vulture"`: gaudy outfit, prominent headgear, the works. Might also be retcon(?) from Lat. papulus "pimple" -> papus "big pimple", but why then change the ending? Dysmorodrepanis 21:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genus

I don't know where the claimed Linnaean genus came from. In the relevant editio decima, its Vultur alone with the other vultures. I added the correct page and descrition too. Jimfbleak (talk) 19:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References, No. 22. --Vejvančický (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name incorrect

For more then 20 years now it's common knowlidge that Condors (ilke "King Vulture") are not related to eighter "Bird of preys" ( = Falconiformes and Accipitriformes ) or vultures (wich belong to the Accipitriformes -order.) Some claims have later been been made that Condors should be placed in the other order of "Bird of preys" Falconiformes. But even if this was true (wich it isn't), and the seven speicies of Condors should be a family in the Falconiformes-order, all true vultures is in the Accipitriformes -order. Therefore poular names like "King Vulture" of the lowland living Condor Sarcoramphus papa is an extremly bad choice. The so called "King Vulture" has got nothing to do whith real vultures, nore is the "vultures of the new world" an acceptable choice of popular-unifying-term of theese seven speicies. They are in a popular name simply "Condors" by modern taxiology and nomenclature. I think a better popular name for this Condor Sarcoramphus papa is eighter "Lowland Condor" or "King Condor". Awayanoder (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Modern taxiology" you mean taxonomy, right? Anyway, no matter what order it's in, the common name will probably remain remain the same.Dgrootmyers (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(featured 2day Mon 2Mar9) THIS IS A SCARY LOOKING BIRD!

Wow ! THIS IS A SCARY LOOKING BIRD!
Thanks for featuring it today [2Mar9] as I've learned a lot! 70.108.123.165 (talk) 11:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No birds are scary, or needs to be. Only a very young child can be hurt or killed by the biggest birds of prey. And only if there is no other humans for a mile around. I've never ever heard about that a bird attacked and hurt humans. In general birds have good eyesight, and hearing. But smelling and tasting are rather unknown areas. If a dead animal in wintertime is placed for fooding of eagles the eagles always wait until som craw-bird like a raven starts to eat. One theory of how pidgeons find their way (back to their nest) suggests smelling, but seems unlikely. Vultures (true vultures) spy ovar large areas on high altitude - but they just don't look down but also at the other vultures around, and when one vulture finds food, and dives, others follow after. They seem to find fresh corpse well as fast as smelling old.

Most birds are also very social and prefer company of other birds. Awayanoder (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR removed, pending discussion on talk

Wikipedia:Featured article review/King Vulture/archive1. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in desperate need of cleanup. Here's what I've found; now let's see if anyone responds on this dusty, unedited excuse of a talk page:

  • Second paragraph under "fossil record and evolution" is unsourced. Third paragraph is also undersourced.
Refs added. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • First paragraph of "Bartram's Painted Vulture" section is unsourced.
Section rewritten and reffed. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Some argue" used twice in Diet header.
both removed Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
replaced both now with published material Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
agree we need to find better refs for the seven bits of text using this ref as a ref. will update when completed. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This page was originally written by Jack Bellinger, who used to maintain the records of all captive King Vultures. He is cited by this article. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 20:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a problem with it sourcing something as mundane as a few stamps. 04:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Additionally, it has images of the stamps there, so they do exist. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Be that as it may, the fossil record, though scant, supports the theory that the ancestral King Vultures and South American Condors separated at least some 5 mya." — "Be that as it may" isn't needed (and thus removed), and rest is weaselwordy.
  • Links to dab pages: Avian and dihedral.
tweaked Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "though fossil members are known." Are we allowed to self-link within articles? This link jumps down to a section of the article.
delinked. shouldn't need to link there anyway. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I should be able to help out here. I've got two new books from the library that deal with vultures too. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...yields these other papers to look through - to double check which might be too esoteric etc. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Title: Chromosomal analysis in Cathartidae: distribution of heterochromatic blocks and rDNA, and phylogenetic considerations Author(s): Tagliarini MM, Pieczarka J, Nagamachi C, et al. Source: GENETICA Volume: 135 Issue: 3 Pages: 299-304 Published: APR 2009 Times Cited: 0

 Done simple one - added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2. Title: King vultures (Sarcoramphus papa) forage in moriche and cucurit palm stands Author(s): Schlee MA Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 39 Issue: 4 Pages: 458-461 Published: DEC 2005 Times Cited: 0

 Done simple one - added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3. Title: First record of Sarcoramphus Dumeril 1806 (Ciconiiformes : Vulturidae) from the Pleistocene of Buenos Aires province, Argentina Author(s): Noriega JI, Areta JI Source: JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES Volume: 20 Issue: 1-2 Special Issue: Sp. Iss. SI Pages: 73-79 Published: OCT 2005 Times Cited: 1

 Done simple one - added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4. Title: The birds of "Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipo": The Rio Cipo valley, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author(s): Rodrigues M, Carrara LA, Faria LP, et al. Source: REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOLOGIA Volume: 22 Issue: 2 Pages: 326-338 Published: JUN 2005 Times Cited: 12

5. Title: Breeding biology of the King Vulture (Sarcoramphus papa) in southeastern Brazil Author(s): de Carvalho EPM, Zorzin G, Specht GVA Source: ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL Volume: 15 Issue: 2 Pages: 219-224 Published: 2004 Times Cited: 0

6. Title: First record of tandem flying in the King Vulture (Sarcoramphus papa) Author(s): Schlee MA Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 35 Issue: 3 Pages: 263-264 Published: SEP 2001 Times Cited: 0

 Done interesting one - added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

7. Title: Observations of king vultures (Sarcoramphus papa) drinking and bathing Author(s): Baker AJ, Whitacre DF, Aguirre O Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 30 Issue: 4 Pages: 246-247 Published: DEC 1996 Times Cited: 1

 Done simple one - added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

8. Title: Estimating age classes in king vultures (Sarcoramphus papa) using plumage coloration Author(s): Eitniear JC Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 30 Issue: 1 Pages: 35-38 Published: MAR 1996 Times Cited: 2

 Done interesting one - added. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

9. Title: First isolation of tandemly repeated DNA sequences in New World vultures and phylogenetic implications Author(s): Keyser C, Montagnon D, Schlee M, et al. Source: GENOME Volume: 39 Issue: 1 Pages: 31-39 Published: FEB 1996 Times Cited: 7

10. Title: Nest records for the king vulture (Sarcoramphus papa) in Venezuela Author(s): Schlee MA Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 29 Issue: 4 Pages: 269-272 Published: DEC 1995 Times Cited: 1

11. Title: HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF MIGRANT AND RESIDENT VULTURES IN CENTRAL VENEZUELA Author(s): KIRK DA, CURRALL JEP Source: JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY Volume: 25 Issue: 4 Pages: 327-337 Published: NOV 1994 Times Cited: 2

 Not done looked at, but material covered by secondary sources already in article. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

12. Title: OBSERVATIONS AT A KING VULTURE (SARCORAMPHUS-PAPA) NEST IN VENEZUELA Author(s): RAMO C, BUSTO B Source: AUK Volume: 105 Issue: 1 Pages: 195-196 Published: JAN 1988 Times Cited: 3

13. Title: COURTSHIP DISPLAY AND GREETING CEREMONIES IN THE KING-VULTURE-SARCORAMPHUS PAPA (L) Author(s): SCHLEE MA Source: COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE III-SCIENCES DE LA VIE-LIFE SCIENCES Volume: 304 Issue: 9 Pages: 207-212 Published: MAR 7 1987

Orphaned references in King Vulture

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of King Vulture's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "BirdLife":

  • From Black Vulture: "Coragyps atratus". 2007 IUCN Red List. BirdLife International. Archived from the original on December 10, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-03.
  • From California Condor: BirdLife International (2007) Species factsheet: Gymnogyps californianus. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 17 August '2007
  • From Turkey Vulture: "Species factsheet: Cathartes aura". BirdLife International. Archived from the original on November 28, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From Andean Condor: "Species factsheet: Vultur Gryphus". BirdLife International. 2004. Retrieved 2008-01-04.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Vultures in the New World

There are no Vultures in the the world - and no Condors in the old world. This has been known since the 1990's through genethical science. Condors and Vultures resembles each others in way of living, but that's all. I can also be seen, the red top on the head only exists on Condors. And "King Vulture" ought to be renamed to "King Condodor" or preferably "Amazonian Low Land Condor". Again - it's NOT a Vulture !. Please update Your taxonomy about birds. Boeing720 (talk) 12:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Painted Vulture probably a misidentified Caracara

This link includes a critique of the discussion of the purported "Vultur sacra," especially a criticism of the Zootaxa report from Snyder & Fry. This is original material presented on that website-- http://wildbirdsbroadcasting.blogspot.com/2014/06/vultur-sacra-invalid-taxon.html

Further, I will add that it is more likely, than what I originally presumed, that William Bartram took it upon himself to perpetuate the deliberate augmentation of his description of "Vultur sacra" from the heavily paraphrased "King of the Vultures" by George Edwards. Bartram did write a 28-item errata after his Travels were published, and due to the likelihood that no reference to the "Painted Vulture" would have been mentioned in that errata, thus by implication meaning that Bartram felt that there was nothing to correct, it gives argument to the notion that Bartram alone wrote the heavily paraphrased description.

Snyder & Fry mention a limestone bowl from Alabama with features of a Sarcorhamphus vulture (King/"Painted"), but the nature of the representation itself does not remove, nor does their report reconcile, the greater likelihood that what is being represented is actually a Turkey Meleagris gallopavo.

Likewise, Snyder & Fry correlate the identity of the "white eagle" of du Pratz in Histoire de la Louisiane (1758) as the "Painted Vulture," but do not consider the possibility of other species accounting for its identity. From the original description by du Pratz, written in French and translated, I cannot reconcile the possibility that, more likely, the bird described was one common to the Mississippi delta but only rare in du Pratz's native France, and that this bird is none other than the Osprey Pandion haliaetus. The overhead flight of the osprey reveals a bird that might by layperson impression look entirely white, save for the tips of its wings, which are black. The underwing itself, in many illustrations and photographs, does have a fine dark brown barred pattern, but in flight even this can appear white.

King Vulture has been reported as an escape in Florida (Monroe Co., 1957) and Orange Co. (1988-1989) in Stevenson & Anderson, Birdlife of Florida.

A pair of King Vultures was also believed, in a compelling observation of Elliott Coues, to have occurred in the San Francisco Mountains of Arizona Territory, 1865. Another claim, later published by Coues, is from a communication of Willard Rice to Coues of a pair occurring in the Verde River circa 1881, but I refute the latter claim. See information in above link regarding sources of Coues' writings on the King.

Mathew Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmslouis (talk • contribs) 15:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: Third paragraph ("Snyder & Fry mention..."). I am not familiar with the image of the representation on the bowl to confidently ascribe a specific identity, yet I am suggesting that a Sarcorhamphus vulture, in some likelihood, may not be the basis for the representation. This is a matter that should be further researched. Comments here are not a comprehensive summary as to the potential or hypothetical occurrence of Sarcorhamphus papa north of Mexico (further necessary elaboration on my statements in sixth paragraph ("[A] pair of King vultures...") not included here). --db-user db-user (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarcoramphus papa (Königsgeier - King Vulture) - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2013-01.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Sarcoramphus papa (Königsgeier - King Vulture) - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2013-01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 28, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-10-28. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

King vulture
A portrait of a king vulture (Sarcoramphus papa) at Walsrode Bird Park, Germany. This species of vulture lives predominantly in tropical lowland forests stretching from southern Mexico to northern Argentina. Though its ruff, flight, and tail feathers are gray to black, the king vulture's head and neck are bald and with varying skin color.Photograph: Olaf Oliviero Riemer
Archive – More featured pictures...

Source for Maya glyph

I am tagging as dubious the claim that wikt:cozcacuauhtli is associated with the Maya. It is a Nahuatl word and as the Wiktionary link states, is associated with the Aztecs. The issue might stem from how old the source is (1910). I did not remove the claim as the source is cited multiple times and there are issues with its veracity. Xochiztli (talk) 17:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on King vulture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:King_vulture&oldid=1207983507"