Talk:Jack Goes Boating
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
I just split this info from the play article. I personally did not copy the text. -- Erroneuz1 (talk) 04:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's not your fault but I checked and the plot summary is a copy and paste. I have removed it. An original plot summary will need to be written. - Kollision (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 28 November 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
![]() | It was proposed in this section that Jack Goes Boating (film) be renamed and moved to Jack Goes Boating.
decision: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
Jack Goes Boating (film) → Jack Goes Boating – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TWODABS: convert the dab into a hatnote with this as the main article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support – here are the page views for the last year: the film has more views than the play by almost 12-to-1, meaning the film gets more than 90% of the looks. That seems to be a WP:TWODABS with a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC situation. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support per above, but even better merge the play article into the film. It's only a 5-sentence stub that's highly related to the film. Station1 (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.