Talk:Hunter's Creek, Florida

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hunter's Creek, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 16:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter's Creek, Florida → Hunters Creek, Florida – The place name, under USGS rules is Hunters Creek, no apostrophe. The article itself admits that fact. If the article is for a CDP, the official CDP name should be used, not the one used by a planned development within the CDP. Arecaceæ2011 (talk) 06:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Wikipedia's article title policy is to use common names, not to follow some governmental authority's preference. The U.S. government has a hostile attitude toward apostrophes. Wikipedia should not. Moreover, when sources are mixed, Wikipedia's preference is to use the form that most resembles ordinary English formatting, and the form that is most natural in English is the one with the apostrophe. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose: The USGS is not always correct when it comes to naming and they do have procedures to correct namings. The Census Board uses USGS as established names and again, they are usually open to name changes. An example I can think of personally is Fish Hawk, Florida on the talk page which might be something I need to review again. – The Grid (talk) 12:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.