Talk:Hazbin Hotel

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wiki Loves Pride This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2022 and 2024.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles Animation: American / Television / Web Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Web animation work group (assessed as High-importance). Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. 2010s Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add this to [ Category: LGBT speculative fiction television series ] as well, which is more useful to find genre shows like this than the more general LGBT drama series sorted by decade/country categories.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hazbin Hotel s2 is expected around late 2025 or early 2026 HazbinEdits (talk) 22:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot

1. That's Entertainment (Hazbin Hotel)

Season 1

1. Overture (Hazbin Hotel)
2. Radio Killed the Video Star
3. Scrambled Eggs (Hazbin Hotel)
4. Masquerade (Hazbin Hotel)
5. Dad Beat Dad
6. Welcome to Heaven
7. Hello Rosie!
8. The Show Must Go On (Hazbin Hotel)

-- Alex_21 _TALK 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure this is one of the most polarizing shows of the year. Why is there no Criticism section in it? Oixyplanet (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Various criticisms of the show are covered in the "Reception" section. However, one thing to note is that while yes, this show is very controversial, a lot of the outcry against it just comes from people on social media, not independent reliable sources. That's why there might not be as many negative notations in the reception section. Blubewwy (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the writing present in this article lags well behind that of the majority of entries on this site, and falls short of the standard that viewers would, and should, expect from a Wikipedia approved entry. Several aspects of note are the grammar, vocabulary, and the general flow of the sentences, but the most prominently lacking mechanic is the entry’s sentence structure. There’s little to no variation in how an action, a verb, is attributed to it’s owner, the subject. This leads to the entry reading like a list of bullet points. The whole thing comes off as if it were written by a grade schooler, or else was intentionally written as an exercise to work the readers English language skills, who finds themself restructuring and/or rewriting the sentences as they read in order to achieve a more pleasing, if not at the very least passable, reading experience. The portion of the entry on the animations reception is the most egregious in relation to the rest of the entry, but the entry as a whole stands to gain if more than just that particular section is addressed. 2601:205:4880:B106:0:0:0:81 (talk) 04:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok? It seems pretty much like any other lead paragraph in an animation article to me. Don't think there's any issues with it. Blubewwy (talk) 05:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]