Talk:Expanded Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 24 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Expanded Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale (EGIDS) to Expanded Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 24 June 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 10:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Expanded Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale (EGIDS) → Expanded Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale – Remove the acronym per WP:TITLE — Sagotreespirit (talk) 07:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Information out of date
There is a newer version of EGIDS which takes sign languages into account. This newer version is presented on Ethnologue[1] in the section on "Language status". That page also cites the basis for the changes from the original EGIDS, in an article that I wrote with Lewis and Simons.[2] Due to Wikipedia's policy on self-citation, I won't add this to the article, but ask that someone else do so.
- ^ https://www.ethnologue.com/methodology/#Status.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ Bickford, J. Albert (2014). "Rating the vitality of sign languages". Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 36 (5): 513–527. doi:10.1080/01434632.2014.966827. Retrieved 2024-07-23.