Talk:Benares State
![]() | Kasi Kingdom was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 December 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Benares State. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge
![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page. |
There is another article on th same topic. See.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasi_Kingdom
Somebody merge these two pages.. I dont know anything about how to work on wikipedia and I dont come online anyway.. so somebody please do it... :)
--SanskritGuy (talk) 07:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've added {{merge}} template to the smaller article of these two. As the merge proposal is seen, the articles will be merged by willing users soon. Thank you for noticing. %Gryllida 08:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
no need to merge two as there is much difference between two articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.153.47.93 (talk) 04:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Bad Idea! Kingdom of Kashi is about the historic kingdom of Kashi, the present city of Varanasi, while Kasi Kingdom of Ancient India, is one that finds mention in ancient Hindu texts, as the intro and the subsequent texts mention of both clarify and are thus distinct. Needs disambig note on top that's all! --Ekabhishektalk 08:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Now added the about template to avoid this confusion. Thanks! --Ekabhishektalk 08:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Bad idea. The two articles are about two distinct subjects and a merge doesn't make sense. —SpacemanSpiff 19:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is a bad idea, but right now I do not know what to do about it. The article about ancient Kashi has a lot of content but I think all of it is totally bogus and ought to be deleted. I have not had time to find a good source about ancient Kashi, but its existence is documented in as much literature as the existence of ancient Greece is in Western literature. Merging the articles here would be like merging Ancient Greece with [[Greece]. It makes no sense.
- It seems like no one is interested in doing the actual merge. I will get to this when I can in about two months or whenever someone else also commits to working on it. If the articles do get merged, then I feel nothing is really lost because like I said the article on ancient Kashi is garbage and actually the one on modern Kashi is not good either. Blue Rasberry 20:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Yes_check.svg/20px-Yes_check.svg.png)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Benares State. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221030606/http://uqconnect.net:80/~zzhsoszy/ips/b/benares.html to http://uqconnect.net/~zzhsoszy/ips/b/benares.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)