Talk:A Jury of Her Peers

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Short story / Crime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Short story task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Crime task force (assessed as Low-importance). Feminism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I added an infobox for the story, as well as an external link to the original publication and the John Hossack murder case the story is loosely based on.Jsanc4 (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current summary is way too long for a short story. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The extremely short summary and extremely long paraphrase have been removed. This information has been condensed into a more concise plot summary. However, the page is missing a great deal of valuable information. Character analysis/roles, symbolism, themes and motifs, and critical reception are some of the areas of work that still need to be implemented. Damianperez (talk) 13:37, 4 December 2010

The summary states, "he finds Mrs. Wright in a delirious state." I don't see evidence of her being delirious. Oeparker1 (talk) 02:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the word delirious is too strong but there is evidence that she looked lost and confuse. Also, the introduction of the characters is a little confusing, and the plot summary lack a few details. I think it would be better if it was mention that the women find the evidence while the men were upstairs in the scene looking for evidence.Agard6 (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Jury of Her Peers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120124042952/http://www.whatsoproudlywehail.org:80/curr/session-7/ to http://www.whatsoproudlywehail.org/curr/session-7/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100125221916/http://scribblingwomen.org:80/sbjuryfeature.htm to http://www.scribblingwomen.org/sbjuryfeature.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page could use several edits: 1. The second reference needs to be removed because the link brings the user to a page that does not exist. 2. The link to the Wikipedia page titled Sally Heckel also needs to be removed because it does not exist either. 3. A box with quick information(ex. author, publication date, country, language, genre) could be added to the top right side. 4. A characters section could be added to avoid confusion of names in the plot summary. 5. In the second sentence of the plot summary should be rewritten due to its wordiness. 6. An adaptations section could be added. Some of the information in the top section above the plot summary could be moved into it. Rpeters1 (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of the specific newspaper in which Glaspell worked for, the Des Moines Daily News. Meghancichon (talk) 23:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This page could also have a themes or symbolism section added to help people understand the deeper meaning of the story, rather than a simple plot summary. Meghancichon (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by WikiProject Novels and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2010 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]