Talk:486958 Arrokoth

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 486958 Arrokoth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

	486958 Arrokoth has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 3, 2019 Good article nominee Listed
	A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on December 31, 2018.
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024.

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Discussions: (486958) 2014 MU69 → Ultima Thule (asteroid) — No consensus, 23 January 2019 (discussion)

I'm finding it hard to keep track of which lobe is Wenu and which is Weeyo. But it might help that Sky crater is on Weeyo (both have a Y at/near the end) and Kaʼan Arcus (the 'road to nowhere') is on Wenu (both have an N at/near the end). — kwami (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwamikagami: I like to think the smaller lobe Weeyo as "wheel," considering that the Sky impact likely detached the lobes and left Weeyo rolling in orbit as it re-merged with Wenu. But that's just my way of quirky thinking, so do what suits you. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 16:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To me, Wenu looks like a wheel, so I don't think that would work for me. I suspect most people are just going to call them the large and small lobes, though. — kwami (talk) 16:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the information about Ultima Thule being used by Nazis removed? ✶Quxyz✶ 06:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the wake of the changes made to Neptune's images to bring it closer to true color, I would like to bring up that I am fairly certain that the images of Arrokoth on its page are also inaccurate and heavily saturated. Tholins, although often termed as appearing "red" by astronomers, almost never appear truly red in the colloquial sense on astronomical bodies -- this extends from Pluto and Charon to Europa's linea, which all appear muddy brown. Therefore, it should stand to reason that Arrokoth's true color would likewise also be similar; it may be best to find a more accurate color image of Arrokoth. ArkHyena (talk) 00:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]