Talk:1906 World Series

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Baseball: Cubs High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Chicago Cubs. Illinois Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be better to use the names of the teams that they had at the time of the game? I believe the Cubs back then were known by a different name. Pknkly (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guess this series could be called the Windy Series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:39FC:C60:3814:4CF8:CEC6:C787 (talk) 14:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]