Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio task force
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Texas/San Antonio task force and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This WikiProject is believed to be semi-active. Although activity is slower than it once was, anyone is welcome to participate in the project. Remove the
|Semi-active parameter from this template if activity resumes or if this tag was changed in error. If almost no activity occurs in this WikiProject, consider replacing this tag with {{WikiProject status|Inactive}} . |
On 8 November 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved to WP:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio. The result of the discussion was moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio task force. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
USAA importance
I was on the USAA talk page and changed its importance to High for San Antonio as the Wikiproject Assessment. I'm now having second thoughts about that, as you all seem to be better than most (all?) Wikiprojects in doing rational relative importance assessments. So if anyone wants to revert that change, please feel free, and accept my apologies for being overly BOLD.~~---- FeralOink (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- I say that it shall be a mid importance for San Antonio, that's too BOLD, but being BOLD is still great. Sportsfangnome (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Edit-athon invite
Hi everyone,
If you're in San Antonio, we of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a sister project of Women in Red, would like to invite you to an edit-athon we're conducting at the American Academy of Religion on Friday, November 17, 10 am - 12 pm CST. If interested, please contact User:RosPost for more information. Best, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 8 November 2023
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio task force. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 18:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject San Antonio → WP:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio – Reverse the redirect. This is already a taskforce of WikiProject Texas; so it should be located in the taskforce position. -- this would implement the supported proposal from 2020. -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. SnowFire (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: If this is moved to be a task force then the proper name (based on most task forces) is Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio task force. This can be seen by the same example given by the op (in their other nominations) which leads to Wikipedia:WikiProject California/Los Angeles area task force. Gonnym (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Move to WP:WikiProject Texas/San Antonio task force per Gonnym. Anyway, the gist here is that we have too many moribund "micro-wikiprojects" and they need to merge to continue serving any purpose at all. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 21:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC)