Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:What isn't grounds for article deletion" on Wikipedia
- or are not valid per policy, and makes false assertions while doing so. What it means is that the sole author of this page wishes that certain nominations...1 KB (138 words) - 17:10, 21 March 2022
- the issues are: 1. Is false information always grounds for deletion? Rick says it is. I say it isn't. At the risk of being pedantic, I'd say that it...20 KB (3,296 words) - 15:47, 5 September 2023
- template ({{drv2}}, on the deletion review subpage (no, there's no {{drv1}})) gets filled out wrong. The deletion discussion isn't linked, or the wrong one's...21 KB (2,518 words) - 12:55, 22 August 2024
- be a valid grounds for deletion, and many other editors do. People find support for "notability" as a grounds for deletion in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia...44 KB (6,537 words) - 10:58, 24 September 2010
- speedied on those grounds, seems reasonable -- removal because noone has successfully created an article that survived merging and deletion over time, even...6 KB (869 words) - 20:20, 2 September 2024
- believe in banning anybody for anything. The person who takes the initiative to put an article on Votes for deletion isn't allowed to do the actual deleting...84 KB (13,943 words) - 13:39, 4 February 2023
- (UTC) As i understand it, this is intended when an article about an entity claims notability on the grounds of its internet presence, and a google or similer...3 KB (404 words) - 11:33, 31 March 2022
- quality is not grounds for deletion, but improvement). Quality and original research are not necessarily linked. A well written article can still be original...151 KB (22,453 words) - 17:14, 13 March 2023
- there is in any case complicated by the nonpublic nature of the grounds for deletion. Another approach suggested in the past was to expand G5 to cover...108 KB (15,034 words) - 21:35, 2 September 2024
- should be incorporated into Wikipedia:What is an article or the FAQ. Discussing it on Votes for deletion isn't quite the right place. I would like it...89 KB (14,877 words) - 19:54, 28 February 2023
- keep, it just languished on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old for a long time without anyone deciding what action to take. Apparently the debate is now...227 KB (34,254 words) - 12:02, 4 February 2023
- (UTC) Shall the assertion that the subject of an article is "non-notable" be grounds for speedy deletion? Poll is open. 00:55, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC) NB This...108 KB (16,871 words) - 13:40, 4 February 2023
- Radiant_>|< 22:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC) If an article isn't a copright violation, then it shouldn't qualify for speedy deletion (unless there are other problems with...113 KB (16,806 words) - 14:38, 17 April 2022
- text is grounds for deletion. This is a perversion of the whole process. We are supposed to support each other, and an editor who creates an article that...70 KB (10,123 words) - 13:48, 4 February 2023
- but that's no grounds for putting in an arbitrary cutoff point. An article's age is irrelevant; it's its content that matters, and NPP isn't perfect. If...157 KB (23,189 words) - 14:45, 14 March 2023
- an appropriate article (i.e. Google Maps) could qualify as fair-use, regardless of what purpose the company produces said images for. —Kirill Lokshin...173 KB (26,320 words) - 03:45, 10 March 2023
- individually fail WP:OR and they may not be notable, however, that is not a grounds for deletion in this case. Therefore, the decision here is to keep. 山本一郎 (会話)...2 KB (326 words) - 08:06, 22 June 2010
- currently isn't. Concerning point 3, I was not intending to propose any system: by "grounds for delisting" I simply meant that if a listed article does not...653 KB (100,365 words) - 00:35, 5 June 2022
- the grounds for deletion. On WP:DRV one frequently has to do a lot of tealeaf reading to figure out why the admin actually speedied the article. I'm...297 KB (44,839 words) - 10:21, 26 May 2022
- 3 August 2006 (UTC) I don't. This discussion isn't about that. The basis of the Article for Deletion nominations is that this policy WP:NOT specifically...248 KB (38,349 words) - 01:11, 23 April 2022
- can recall), speedy deletion on the grounds of "unremarkable subject" has been proposed for pages that don't meet the criteria for that ("a real person
- community support for, deletion of pages that comprise transclusions from elsewhere of poor quality content. This is on the grounds that (a) we improve
- 2005-08-10 (UTC) I don't see what is unfriendly about the new version. I have removed many of the "will be grounds for speedy deletion" from WB:WIN after the