Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Username policy/Archive 27" on Wikipedia
- c) 🐱 12:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC) Maybe something like This page is for reporting accounts whose names blatantly violate the username policy. then? ("Accounts...30 KB (4,023 words) - 12:41, 10 July 2024
- 2014 Request for Comment on reforming and updating this policy Wikipedia:Username policy/RFC 2024 has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking...9 KB (870 words) - 17:04, 22 July 2024
- Wikipedia talk:Username policy. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Username policy/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Username policy. This page was...75 KB (39 words) - 03:12, 23 July 2024
- new username, or start to vandalize in extreme cases. Third, if the editors who are blocked have read the username policy and saw that usernames consisting...169 KB (26,798 words) - 13:03, 13 April 2022
- in accordance with wikipedia policy or not? hmm...i don't mean to be rude, but isn't it sort of obvious...that a username like "obvioustroll" could be...139 KB (22,285 words) - 06:01, 30 January 2023
- and policies. They should be slapped down hard. I would hope that every editor would have the maturity to avoid even potentially offensive usernames. But...127 KB (15,771 words) - 12:47, 18 February 2023
- policy RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC) And while we're at it, let's shorten usernames like...154 KB (22,254 words) - 20:57, 2 March 2023
- TALK| HISTORY 15:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Actually, this changes everything. The WP:U policy is specifically about the content of the usernames themselves. If...112 KB (14,617 words) - 10:55, 21 April 2023
- I think this part of the policy is somewhat badly written, because it gets confused between types of usernames that are disallowed (or sometimes disallowed)...156 KB (21,703 words) - 04:57, 3 April 2023
- that any policy restricting username scripts is unnecessary? Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Correct. Kim Bruning 12:17, 27 December 2006...112 KB (16,219 words) - 09:52, 21 March 2023
- policy on confusing usernames, since they cannot be read by a majority of our users. Others point to the section that states that non-latin usernames...165 KB (23,560 words) - 08:53, 26 March 2023
- time, "users ... may freely use proxies". BTW, Wikipedia_talk:Username_policy/Archive_18#RfC_on_the_WP:NOSHARE_prohibition. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:01, 17...150 KB (19,952 words) - 18:54, 8 May 2022
- (UTC) Is it possible to change my username at a different Wikipedia? Yes, see meta:Changing username. Angela. 18:27, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC) I have two questions...68 KB (9,897 words) - 18:24, 7 April 2023
- fall under the username policy? Gigs (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC) No, they should fall under the conflict of interest policy. The username is not the problem...179 KB (26,449 words) - 17:19, 21 February 2023
- against promotional usernames and the policy against usernames implying shared use. The discussion often refers to these kinds of usernames under the blanket...227 KB (31,792 words) - 14:49, 5 June 2022
- talk:Username policy/Archive 7#Username blocking and discussion at WP:VPP was the original thread on WT:U; Wikipedia talk:Username policy/Archive 7#Biting...153 KB (21,973 words) - 00:50, 5 June 2022
- that. ÷seresin 19:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)" What do you all think? The username policy applies equally to signatures and usernames, after all. (Context)...157 KB (19,733 words) - 05:06, 14 March 2023
- ViperSnake151 Talk 20:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Support as a natural extension of Wikipedia username policy, which bans misleading usernames. Spirit of Eagle (talk)...209 KB (29,480 words) - 01:27, 4 July 2024
- don't really understand why we don't allow email addresses as usernames anyway, and the policy doesn't explain it at all. I'd say it's a judgement call thing...158 KB (23,537 words) - 08:22, 14 February 2024
- they aren't username vios. Is this clarified in the username policy at all, and if not should it? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:27, 22 February...148 KB (19,980 words) - 00:31, 30 March 2023
- English Wikipedia has also w:Wikipedia:Banning policy that should not be confused with blocking policy. I have changed few instances of "banning" to "blocking"
- t/c 11:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC) I just archived a successful adminship request... then I thought about archiving the three current (??) confirmations.
- Thanks for clearifying this. Effeietsanders 19:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC) Please discuss changes to policy on the relevant talk page. Xania's comment is