Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Chester Leszek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Please move this page to the WP space. Thanks. Regards, 198.84.253.202 (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Done NeilN talk to me 04:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Leszek

Chester Leszek (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
 

18 March 2018

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

These two very similar edits: [1] [2] (see the edit summaries) to the same page by an IP which has no previous edits are immediately suspicious: Sock, or case of editing while logged out. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another very similar IP - same edits (with no other edit before "magically" appearing and reverting within 30 minutes of the content being added), claiming a certain source is not legitimate. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 23:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

If you have worries about the IP being the sock of (whoever), file an appropriate report at the appropriate place

No opinion on the subject of the SPI, but it's pretty obvious that the IP who filed this report (it was moved here by NeilN if I understand it correctly) is themselves not a new user and is themselves most likely a sock puppet. So Wikipedia is pretty much at the point where sockpuppets are reporting potential other sockpuppets.Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, as soon as somebody disagrees, he's a sockpuppet? 198.84.253.202 (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
When that somebody is a brand new account which knows how to file an SPI and ask for page protection [3] after only a few edits, then hell WP:DUCK yeah. So, which banned user's sock puppet are you? Volunteer Marek (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, 1020 edits is only "a few" 198.84.253.202 (talk) 00:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Anyway I have experience under previous IPs (which I could potentially reveal, but a sincere look at my contribution history will allow you to conclude it on your own. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your account was started on January 1st, 2018. Additionally it looks like you made an edit with another one of your accounts here as "User:Janj9088" presumably to avoid breaking 3RR (same obscure source as you've used).Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly could continue arguing, but with such an example of WP:ABF, that's not necessary. WP:DEADHORSE. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 03:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure admins don't mind missing this bickering but any reason why you're still using this talk page instead of the project page? --NeilN talk to me 03:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN:I just figured it out. This page wasn't moved - it's content was copied to another page, but it wasn't moved (a move would preserve page history, which isn't the case here, compare with this page's history). 198.84.253.202 (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments