Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Trampikey

• Big comment would it be ok if I striked out most of the Oppose votes as their authors fail my IQ criteria and Hygienic standarts? ackoz 15:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ehmm.. one more thing: don't take this personally because I didn't say who of the editors doesn't meet the required hygienic standards. Plus, nobody really meets my IQ criteria so .. take it easy. ackoz 16:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The authors of the oppose votes below are legitimate and respected editors. For that matter, the authors of the support votes above are also legitimate and respected editors. This RFA discussion is here to promote consensus and thoughtful decision making, not to deride the people participating in it. In fact, no discussions on Wikipedia should exist to deride the participants. --Elkman 18:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you did decide to try something so stupid, you'd just find yourself blocked for WP:POINT and WP:NPA. NSLE 18:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think my hygiene is adequate. The IQ is questionable -- Samir धर्म 23:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification Samir, I think you passed my IQ test .. unlike NSLE (if anyone has the right to assess person's ability to be an admin here, or point out that the voting editor only has 26 edits so far, like sushi did recently, I think I have the right to draw conclusions about one's intelligence and use my personal conclusions and standards (or criteria if you like) and use them to invalidate editor's arguments, just as the others use other criteria to invalidate the nominator's arguments. again - no personal attack intended, NSLE) I hope I didnt disrupt wikipedia by placing a (uncivil.. I don't adhere to wp rules so much) comment on a talk page. I see you would actually like to block me NSLE, but I never did anything you could call stupid and I never will. Well I sriked out some votes in some AfD and marked them as invalid .. but that's long time ago :) And Elkman: by saying I am not so convinced that you really need the sysop chores as much as I do, almost everyone here derides someone. So don't play that. ackoz 02:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever your argument with another user is, I think it is inappropriate to argue about it in someone elses RfA. A little respect for Trampikey would be nice. Viridae^Talk 03:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ackoz, if you're just here to cause an argument, don't bother. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 06:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, this argument is pointless. Freddie _Message? 23:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was not discussing that to cause an argument. How could you know? Are you a psychic?
Again, I use IQ (i.e. the value I estimated) as a criterion for assessing the user's ability to be an admin or his ability to produce a valid vote on RfA. It is a nonsense, but I find the criterions for most of the oppose votes equally laughable. And I didn't disrupt wikipedia to make a point, thus I didn't violate WP:POINT. I have the same rights as the other editors, and saying that "he didn't pass my IQ test" is not the same as if I was saying "he is stupid", thus this is no personal attack. Pure logic, if I say a didn't pass my test because it's not bigger than 10, it doesn't mean that a is lower than 5. Thus, a feels offended only if it wants to feel offended. Got that?

Anyway, stop posting threats that I will be blocked on my talk page. Threatening me with a block is really a nice argument and, again, it's nonsense because I didn't violate any of the policies. I will remove any such inflammatory comments. ackoz 08:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]