Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Precedents" on Wikipedia
- In the latest edit to the essay, we conflate precedents with precedence and have other grammar errors, like missing apostrophe, plus presumably unreviewed...536 bytes (61 words) - 00:06, 19 May 2024
- of the discussion can be found. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics)/Precedents for a collection of related AfD debates and related information from the...38 KB (5,510 words) - 07:10, 30 April 2024
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 21:08, 22 March 2006
- paragraph indicating that none of the precedents are generally considered binding just because they are precedents, especially as arguments given in discussion...86 KB (12,621 words) - 11:43, 31 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Archive 5 (section CfD reform -- Criteria for deletion based on precedent)whether the precedent should apply, or if a new precedent should be set. This seems like win-win for all involved, especially when precedents need changing...33 KB (5,013 words) - 19:57, 28 February 2023
- 71 bytes (0 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2024
- Wikipedia talk:Stalking (section Precedents)"Rangerdude's interpretation of the precedents". But if the section is going to be called "precedents", then let's limit it to precedents. -Willmcw 08:04, August...124 KB (19,160 words) - 19:23, 4 February 2023
- as can be the case in law. Influence of precedents There have been several arguments surrounding precedents set by accepting this case. However, these...22 KB (3,434 words) - 03:56, 20 May 2022
- certain types of articles, place your suggestion here. Trying to find precedents for importance levels, I'd suggest: Venues Main Olympic Stadiums - mid...6 KB (707 words) - 20:47, 5 August 2024
- I'd like to add something about when and whether being named after helps with notability. People (things) that have streets named after them, species named...18 KB (2,224 words) - 05:20, 10 August 2024
- to learn or look up said precedents). In theory, Wikipedia is relatively democratic, in that anyone can propose new precedents, or changes to existing...8 KB (1,174 words) - 10:23, 22 September 2021
- authority, the conclusions reached can be used as precedents. Thus, deletion debates can function as precedents for future article inclusion and exclusion to...74 KB (11,157 words) - 20:50, 20 August 2024
- Hinds’ Precedents lists the precedent cases that established the rule. Electronic copies of the House Precedents are found here: About precedents of the...14 KB (1,761 words) - 07:26, 4 February 2023
- have any chance of being accepted. Both have to be based on either arcom precedents or on a Wikipedia policy or guideline. In other words, they don't just...3 KB (406 words) - 10:50, 2 August 2006
- Al Gore III, Marcus Bachman, and Nicky Diaz are not precedents. My reply to one of the comments was interrupted by the closing, so I will post the reply...1 KB (147 words) - 16:50, 16 March 2014
- should or shouldn't be included. We are saying that we know what the precedents are in this project and are in the right to enforce them because we've...54 KB (4,752 words) - 22:58, 21 August 2024
- Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/User/Archive/Topical index (section Index of UCFD precedents)various recent discussions regarding the use of precedent at WP:UCFD, I've created an index of UCFD precedents at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Archive/Topical...11 KB (1,600 words) - 18:47, 30 April 2022
- Is this practical? Would this change how precedent works, or cause decisions to be made just on precedent? Will WP:EQUAL change any other policies? Anything...129 KB (18,403 words) - 16:16, 28 January 2023
- Swedish page is similarly awash in made-up cross-categorizations with no precedent in the media. With Ross' page, in the References section they have some...6 KB (734 words) - 06:06, 19 August 2024
- disclaimed that the opinion constitutes a precedent (there are some appeals courts that can't create precedents). I am unsure whether I agree with your...72 KB (10,498 words) - 19:50, 3 May 2022
- variety of factors, including (besides the votes) policies, practices, precedents, arguments, compromises between conflicting positions, and seriousness
- (UTC) Implemented, per the lack of opposition and the multiple deletion precedents. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 22:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC) I'd like to
- to interpret. If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting using precedents in place of policy statements? I like that idea "in principle", but the