Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia_talk:peer review include audio plays
The page "Wikipedia talk:Peer review/include/audio-play.js" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Peer review/include/audio-play.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- (presumed) importance of editorial peer review and the use of peer-reviewed sources. There are multiple problems with peer review, however. Most notably there...354 KB (55,638 words) - 05:46, 5 April 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 71 (section Partner peer review for Operation Badr (1973) now open)lack of reviews. If anyone could go and provide their comments, I would be eternally grateful... plus, if you needed a FAC or GAN or Peer review down the...404 KB (54,020 words) - 14:44, 9 May 2024
- coverage as gameplay, graphics, and audio, and we do recognize that a complete article on a topic should include a plot summary. But plot summaries should...251 KB (34,529 words) - 12:48, 28 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 129 (section Resident Evil 7: Biohazard Peer Review Gone Sexual?!?!!?)point of reference for articles and editors going through quality and peer review. Also, is anyone good with SVGs and interesting helping me workshop a...251 KB (32,212 words) - 13:15, 9 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 89 (section Peer review for Background of the Winter War now open)August 2009 (UTC) The article Arms industry is up for peer review in the main Wikipedia peer review page, any input anyone could provide there would be...252 KB (32,651 words) - 09:31, 4 July 2024
- How are reviews evaluated for video games? I got into a bit of an edit war with an IP over whether PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale has gotten "generally...250 KB (34,313 words) - 11:57, 9 May 2022
- article; you've invested a lot of hard work, sought the aid of peer reviewers, searched for or played the game to obtain relevant, fair use screenshots, and of...203 KB (29,677 words) - 05:09, 3 April 2023
- gerrymandered criteria (not "List of PSVR games with 3D audio and PS Move support"), include reasonable information on each game, and exclude minutia---I...250 KB (32,960 words) - 05:57, 4 February 2023
- to say that one article is more important than another. I think the peer reviewing was much more important. Discussing the faults of the article, instead...90 KB (13,020 words) - 07:33, 12 March 2020
- the peer review, but it left me wondering this, which I'm asking all of you: Is AFC intended to create project pages, such as those needed for peer review...143 KB (18,202 words) - 11:51, 9 May 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 34 (section Technical review needed for Immunologist bio at WP:AFC)on a subset of open-access publishers which employ dubious methods of peer review, questionable handling of editorial-board duties, and predatory financial...256 KB (35,093 words) - 15:20, 16 February 2023
- pasting it into Word. There's a tool that does this User talk:Dr pda/prosesize.js, which I've never used. How many Milhist articles this applies to is anybody's...178 KB (23,474 words) - 09:23, 4 July 2024
- the talk page of the article. WHY? We are suppose to be somewhat of a peer review process along with the GA classification process. So would the reviewers...566 KB (91,668 words) - 06:43, 30 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 62 (section Peer review of Chotto Nō o Kitaeru Otona no DSi Training)January 2009 (UTC) [Shortened title] Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Tōhoku Daigaku Karei Igaku Kenkyūjo Kawashima Ryuta Kyōju Kanshū Chotto...155 KB (20,960 words) - 12:48, 3 February 2024
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular Biology/Genetics/Archive 3 (section Using raw data from peer reviewed papers)are willing to see through external peer review (either solo or as in a group, process analogous to GA / FA review) Image articles, based around an important...164 KB (14,086 words) - 01:24, 13 December 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 21 (section Mega Man Zero (video game) request for review)Hi, I've recently put Mega Man Zero (video game) up for peer review, but progress on its review has been very slow as of late. So I thought I'd just advertise...108 KB (16,683 words) - 16:34, 21 December 2022
- Wikipedia talk:External links/Archive 14 (section Clarifications to "reviews" and "misleading" would be helpful:)information at: External links Don't. That page is a copyvio of this one. ---J.S (T/C) 19:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Probably not a good idea, since the meta...278 KB (42,544 words) - 16:30, 28 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 17 (section Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sympathy Vote)before they start reviewing submissions. Based on your latest work (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio) it does not inspire...186 KB (25,283 words) - 14:08, 4 March 2023
- when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis...244 KB (34,405 words) - 05:39, 30 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:External links/Archive 16 (section Is there a specific process to get independent review for links?)preferred. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 20:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC) This guideline spells is out: we do not link just for the sake of linking. And that includes web directories...365 KB (57,704 words) - 09:47, 10 March 2023
- many ways, editing, researching, annotating, and do that under the review of peers, using the guidelines, and adhering to the policies of those sites