Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Oversight" on Wikipedia
- 93 (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC) Potentially. Please email the Oversight Team with your request. Primefac (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC) ‹ The...26 KB (3,859 words) - 23:07, 19 April 2024
- easily as the oversight permission can be granted, it can be revoked." After the earlier discussion about tight control of the Oversight capability, the...166 KB (22,166 words) - 21:18, 15 January 2024
- concerning the use of CheckUser and Oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia. The AUSC also monitors CheckUser and Oversight activity and use of the applicable...149 KB (18,585 words) - 14:16, 27 February 2024
- been oversighted from the Lechuguilla Cave article. I can see in the page history that at least one revision was deleted, but as a non-oversighter I can't...59 KB (7,844 words) - 21:10, 15 January 2024
- like to hear the oversight team's thoughts on this. On a busy page (like AN/I) if there is a long gap between the posting of oversightable material and its...150 KB (21,114 words) - 21:09, 15 January 2024
- I believe it would be helpful to have a web form for users to request oversight if they are unable or unwilling to use email. I saw some vandalism on...21 KB (3,032 words) - 21:18, 15 January 2024
- neither Oversight nor Checkuser and do not intend to take them in future. Because I am conscious that monitoring the operation of Oversight and Checkuser...44 KB (6,262 words) - 18:55, 16 April 2024
- as a non-Admin, non-Oversight user, I cannot AFAICS put it in the correct place: As can be seen from the image of the Oversight log page which is thumbnailed...11 KB (1,650 words) - 21:18, 15 January 2024
- 2012 (UTC) Well, just for starters: Oversighters don't have access to the arbcom lists, or to the arbwiki. Oversighters are already subject to a much tighter...51 KB (7,721 words) - 18:27, 3 March 2023
- Title: Editorial control process? Editorial oversight and control? FT2 (Talk | email) 02:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC) "Given enough eyeballs, all errors are...2 KB (242 words) - 10:29, 23 September 2023
- was viewing my watchlist then it said: "The August 2009 CheckUser and Oversight elections are open for questions. Voting begins 00:01 July 28 (UTC)."...12 KB (1,573 words) - 19:52, 28 February 2023
- WMF employee, but I am not sure. That's for Oversight only (Special:ListGroupRights says that Oversighters have that permission), but it doesn't apply...26 KB (3,788 words) - 04:46, 4 February 2023
- hands will solve the issues, especially with the time-sensitivity of Oversight. Courcelles 17:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC) Was going to advertise this on...69 KB (7,763 words) - 04:46, 4 February 2023
- analogy drawn here seems a bit illogical - surely oversight is not necessarily selective (i.e. oversighters can superdelete either a whole page or certain...537 bytes (70 words) - 08:49, 2 September 2009
- 2006 Kylu (Talk | contribs) (→See also - Adding wikilink to en:Wikipedia:Oversight) * (cur) (last) 00:17, 28 September 2006 Korg (Talk | contribs) m (→English...3 KB (421 words) - 23:04, 12 October 2006
- Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments/CU/DeltaQuad Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments/CU/DoRD...3 KB (325 words) - 08:51, 10 October 2023
- clarified. Aiken ♫ 18:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC) See the page on CheckUser and Oversight elections for answers to a lot of commons questions. We are unsure of...79 KB (11,511 words) - 10:04, 21 March 2023
- appoint checkuser/oversight, the election is merely advisory. The question being asked is not "Who should be elected to checkuser/oversight" but rather, "Of...146 KB (20,791 words) - 07:36, 27 March 2022
- subsequently RevDel'ed the block, and requested oversight of the block, but then reported that it couldn't be oversighted and shouldn't have been RevDel'ed, and...22 KB (3,084 words) - 16:09, 4 April 2024
- 2018 (UTC) DeltaQuad says she has self reported an issue with her use of oversight involving me. To the extent my view is relevant to the audit I consider...2 KB (177 words) - 23:49, 14 April 2024
- consistency. Oversight, like CU, has a foundationwide policy too. ++Lar: t/c 11:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC) I don't think we need a local oversight policy, since
- "Verified" to "Sourced" in the article. This appears to have been an oversight after a community feeling (if not formal consensus) that the term "verified"
- but several users have spoken passionately about the need for community oversight. The proposed solution seems like a workable middle ground to me. Do you