Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive 33" on Wikipedia
- version, obviously. Many opposes deal not with fiction in particular but with the very concept of notability; I'm trashing all those opposes because they...83 KB (13,111 words) - 07:47, 19 February 2023
- talk:Notability (fiction). It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction). This...93 KB (39 words) - 02:44, 24 October 2023
- devices without Fictional doomsday device or History of doomsday devices in fiction. For those who want to make these list, it would also encourage to validate...16 KB (2,102 words) - 00:05, 19 May 2024
- User:Deckiller/Notability (fiction). It needs some tweaking and whatnot, but that's what we can discuss (among other things). — Deckiller 21:05, 24 June...347 KB (56,361 words) - 06:13, 19 February 2023
- There are no hard and fast rules for notability. However, the below may be used as guidelines. Literary figures who have their own entry in Benet's (ISBN 0713649852)...64 KB (10,215 words) - 16:41, 4 February 2023
- involved constructively. Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-27 Notability (fiction). Hopefully you'll have time to think of a way to address the points...83 KB (13,030 words) - 16:41, 4 February 2023
- the notability guideline itself, whereas the contrary viewpoint as far as I can tell is based on nothing whatsoever. Specific to the topic of fiction, I...179 KB (26,003 words) - 03:41, 23 October 2023
- other notability criteria. Also, most of this page deals with "alternatives to nominating for deletion"—take a look at the "dealing with fiction" and "relocating...98 KB (15,694 words) - 06:27, 30 January 2023
- need Notability (fiction) to repeat it." - That's not the intention of this proposal. The reason why we need a Notability (fiction) is because fiction related...209 KB (31,503 words) - 02:54, 16 December 2023
- as it says in WP:FICT#Works of fiction, "A work of fiction is presumed to be notable if it meets the general notability guideline, the guidelines presented...82 KB (12,921 words) - 06:27, 30 January 2023
- October 2005. Since Wikipedia:Fiction was renamed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) in December 2005. This talk page was first archived on June 25, 2006. The discussion...214 KB (32,034 words) - 12:47, 3 February 2024
- general fiction, crime fiction, historical fiction, romantic fiction and classic fiction have few or no 'fans' - that's most fiction. It's fiction which...81 KB (12,862 words) - 14:23, 28 January 2023
- ideas about having multi-level "notability" for fiction. I can't remember all the details right now (I'll reread the archives in a bit) but from what I can...81 KB (12,904 words) - 06:27, 30 January 2023
- multiple guidelines? Fiction is a big topic. Category:Fiction contains over 28% of the articles on Wikipedia. There are already notability guidelines for books...206 KB (31,036 words) - 12:39, 3 February 2024
- navigation, as all the archived discussions currenltly link to Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)/Deckiller-Sandifer. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 10:54, 11 April...218 KB (34,296 words) - 10:36, 26 May 2022
- Wikipedia:Notability (books) and Wikipedia:Notability (films). Please be clear, that Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) covers the notability of events,...328 KB (51,533 words) - 20:44, 2 March 2023
- quotes. Defining notability for fiction — Wikipedia:Notability say virtually the same, but is much better worded. Dealing with fiction Notable topics —...107 KB (17,186 words) - 05:14, 5 July 2024
- fiction. Let's deal with the issues separately. Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive 42#Non-Independent Sources Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive...205 KB (31,546 words) - 00:40, 5 June 2022
- articles on fiction rather than a precise list of notability criteria. This immensely complicates citations of this guideline, as the notability criteria...91 KB (13,602 words) - 06:27, 30 January 2023
- making demonstrating the notability of fiction <X> excessively difficult. Maybe this is a backlash for all the garbage fiction articles out there (and...90 KB (14,291 words) - 06:26, 30 January 2023
- Girod 15:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC) For recent non-fiction, no. I think that a certain amount of caution need be applied. For recent fiction, yes, I say
- archive? It was created "in the course of events" (developing MediaWiki), and it's verifiable. Surely, we want to require some degree of notability,
- I am not able to archive the text(MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist) or undo/rollback (TW) what I have done. --Good afternoon (discuss • contribs) 08:17,