Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)/Archive 12" on Wikipedia
- Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Proposed wording: Academics/professors...249 KB (35,625 words) - 02:03, 8 November 2020
- talk:Notability (academics). It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). This...49 KB (39 words) - 03:12, 1 May 2024
- the early history of the discussion can be found. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics)/Precedents for a collection of related AfD debates and related...38 KB (5,510 words) - 07:10, 30 April 2024
- function as a source of notability, because peer reviewed publications are how academics assess notability. Forcing notability of academics to be assessed by...243 KB (36,187 words) - 16:40, 4 February 2023
- were discussed on this page and preserved at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)/Archive 5, but on a quick look I can't find any discussion of this example...213 KB (32,433 words) - 07:10, 30 April 2024
- And then there are of course all those academics doing research in industry. I think the majority of academics involved in research are, indeed, employed...78 KB (12,198 words) - 18:29, 29 March 2019
- automatic pass of WP:Notability (academics). On the other hand it's often easier finding independent reliable sources for deceased academics than living ones...262 KB (40,523 words) - 10:14, 16 March 2022
- being cited - none of that conveys notability. Academics doing what is expected of academics is not Wikipedia notability. despite these guidelines “Many...250 KB (37,669 words) - 02:08, 25 December 2022
- allow that academics do tend to publish interesting stuff that other academics, and even laypeople, like to read about. Isn't that notability enough? So...277 KB (43,490 words) - 16:40, 4 February 2023
- topics, are not themselves academics and therefore are not familiar with the measures by which academics themselves measure academic importance (as they do...109 KB (17,511 words) - 18:27, 29 March 2019
- specifically the discussion within about academic organizations and the observation by one AFC reviewer that "Basically academics seriously suck at publicity - pop...237 KB (34,726 words) - 18:36, 3 March 2023
- do a better job including notable academics if it honors the peer review that academics themselves do for notability though the tenure process. Major research...241 KB (35,925 words) - 16:57, 21 March 2022
- relation to determining the notability of academics. For the moment, only a small fraction of currently active academics have their bio entries in Wikipedia...132 KB (21,212 words) - 00:39, 5 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals). But I think as you say there is a large overlap between people interested in AfDs of academics, of academic journals...231 KB (34,764 words) - 16:40, 4 February 2023
- believe that all academic sources are non-independent by virtue of being written by academics about academics, and that only non-academic sources can be...191 KB (29,128 words) - 01:48, 10 June 2019
- the one true metric of academic notability, but if the rationale for WP:PROF is that academics become notable for their academic work, but aren't subjects...50 KB (8,119 words) - 18:28, 29 March 2019
- combination of this one, the books one, and the related proposal Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals)? There are some good things on that page. ···日本穣? · 投稿...46 KB (6,016 words) - 20:11, 28 February 2023
- talk:Notability (academics)#RfC about independent sources for academic notability to decide the following question: Current wording: Academics/professors...77 KB (10,989 words) - 20:31, 23 February 2024
- have an improving Impact Factor. They do this to attract academics to publish because the academics need high IA for their annual acreditation with their...320 KB (46,554 words) - 18:40, 25 July 2024
- notability guidelines for academics, to make it more logical and in line with how academics are evaluated by their peers: Wikipedia talk:Notability...278 KB (41,377 words) - 03:19, 29 March 2022
- /Archive 1 Wikiquote:Image use policy/Quote of the day From this comment by admin BD2412 (talk · contributions) at Village Pump: "Our goal is not "making
- archive? It was created "in the course of events" (developing MediaWiki), and it's verifiable. Surely, we want to require some degree of notability,
- This is a historical archive of old threads of September to November 2005 from Wikibooks talk:Policy/Vote. We should also include all of the Wikicities'