Search results

Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Proposed wording: Academics/professors...

talk:Notability (academics). It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). This...

the early history of the discussion can be found. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics)/Precedents for a collection of related AfD debates and related...

function as a source of notability, because peer reviewed publications are how academics assess notability. Forcing notability of academics to be assessed by...

were discussed on this page and preserved at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)/Archive 5, but on a quick look I can't find any discussion of this example...

And then there are of course all those academics doing research in industry. I think the majority of academics involved in research are, indeed, employed...

automatic pass of WP:Notability (academics). On the other hand it's often easier finding independent reliable sources for deceased academics than living ones...

being cited - none of that conveys notability. Academics doing what is expected of academics is not Wikipedia notability. despite these guidelines “Many...

allow that academics do tend to publish interesting stuff that other academics, and even laypeople, like to read about. Isn't that notability enough? So...

topics, are not themselves academics and therefore are not familiar with the measures by which academics themselves measure academic importance (as they do...

specifically the discussion within about academic organizations and the observation by one AFC reviewer that "Basically academics seriously suck at publicity - pop...

do a better job including notable academics if it honors the peer review that academics themselves do for notability though the tenure process. Major research...

relation to determining the notability of academics. For the moment, only a small fraction of currently active academics have their bio entries in Wikipedia...

Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals). But I think as you say there is a large overlap between people interested in AfDs of academics, of academic journals...

believe that all academic sources are non-independent by virtue of being written by academics about academics, and that only non-academic sources can be...

the one true metric of academic notability, but if the rationale for WP:PROF is that academics become notable for their academic work, but aren't subjects...

combination of this one, the books one, and the related proposal Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals)? There are some good things on that page. ···日本穣? · 投稿...

talk:Notability (academics)#RfC about independent sources for academic notability to decide the following question: Current wording: Academics/professors...

have an improving Impact Factor. They do this to attract academics to publish because the academics need high IA for their annual acreditation with their...

notability guidelines for academics, to make it more logical and in line with how academics are evaluated by their peers: Wikipedia talk:Notability...