Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 39" on Wikipedia
- About this edit summary: Jinnai, can you point me to a specific notability guideline that claims that even in the absence of verifiability, a given topic...158 KB (22,999 words) - 03:48, 16 December 2023
- increasing number of them being made, there needs to be a set of criteria for notability. Possibilities- Certian number of downloads Won Awards Been featured in...76 KB (10,835 words) - 15:03, 9 March 2023
- of WP:N but not necessarily to the GNG — Masem (t) 23:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC) While WP:Notability (numbers) does not specifically mention GNG, it does...209 KB (29,837 words) - 17:24, 16 August 2024
- discussion regarding an alternative was tabled. See Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 49#Association football (soccer). voorts (talk/contributions)...25 KB (3,419 words) - 17:56, 13 August 2024
- Wikipedia talk:Non-notability/Archive 1 "However, it is valid to use notability as a guide to the placement of information" What exactly does this mean...173 KB (24,844 words) - 15:55, 13 July 2024
- is a root of a lot of school-notability problems. That blanket "acceptance" is not a good idea. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Why isn't...288 KB (43,674 words) - 15:48, 10 March 2023
- if necessary. Please add new archivals to Wikipedia talk:Notability (websites)/Archive 05. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. Hiding...147 KB (22,391 words) - 11:20, 31 March 2022
- for notability, and covers most of the mentioned sites, both thoes with offline existance and those like zombo.com. humblefool® 29 June 2005 03:39 (UTC)...236 KB (37,231 words) - 16:20, 19 September 2022
- thought: the {{notability}} template could have links to Google and Google Scholar (and Google News?) using the Notability (web)/Archive 8 template. Favoring...239 KB (36,076 words) - 16:49, 4 February 2023
- far from my area of expertise I'm wondering if anyone can help with the notability of these two entries Shorty Awards and Foodimentary. The latter of these...77 KB (10,989 words) - 20:31, 23 February 2024
- for notability, and covers most of the mentioned sites, both thoes with offline existance and those like zombo.com. humblefool® 29 June 2005 03:39 (UTC)...211 KB (33,283 words) - 12:06, 1 October 2022
- number of editors continue to assert at AfD that certain honours confer notability irrespective of a lack of in-depth coverage in secondary sources. Wikipedia:Articles...150 KB (21,586 words) - 16:27, 16 August 2024
- since they are not coverage of the company per se, they don't establish notability I have issues with Bob's argument. For all but the largest companies/products...21 KB (2,882 words) - 22:49, 23 July 2024
- discussion. DES (talk) 23:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC) I agree with DES. Alot has changed in the last year and a half. Notability is regularly used as a reason...210 KB (34,301 words) - 15:55, 13 July 2024
- encyclopedic. I understand that lists and articles have different criteria for notability, but I think lists of fictional "category X" should have specific rules...16 KB (2,102 words) - 00:05, 19 May 2024
- Wikipedia:Notability/Historical/Arguments and User:Uncle_G/On_notability to the "See also" section, because I think they are useful. -- BenBildstein 06:39, 9...4 KB (614 words) - 15:55, 13 July 2024
- Randomran (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC) If this aspect is discussed elsewhere then we don't need it here too. This page is about notability. Loading it...206 KB (31,036 words) - 12:39, 3 February 2024
- curious how you see it playing out. Thanks, TheronJ 19:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC) How would the notability of a game be decided then? Shrumster 21:08, 23 January...42 KB (5,880 words) - 10:12, 5 March 2022
- freeware program gain notability by being downloaded off archive.org? I thought notability meant "considered worthy of note by reliable secondary sources"...154 KB (22,648 words) - 20:54, 24 March 2022
- three. As I was reviewing the conversations in archives, the proposed guideline page, and Wikipedia:Notability (people). As I compare everything it seems...19 KB (2,811 words) - 20:31, 22 May 2022
- your {{Can'tDelete}} and tagged the appropriate articles. — Jeff Q (talk) 05:39, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) I just noticed that Wikipedia also has a {{Pending deletion}}
- archive? It was created "in the course of events" (developing MediaWiki), and it's verifiable. Surely, we want to require some degree of notability,
- This is a historical archive of old threads of September to November 2005 from Wikibooks talk:Policy/Vote. We should also include all of the Wikicities'