Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (numbers and dates)/Archive 02" on Wikipedia
- Archives Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (years in titles)/Archive 01 I've noticed that Wikipedia:Naming conventions (years in titles) hasn't been finalized...13 KB (1,928 words) - 11:48, 16 January 2022
- 2005 (UTC) And/or discuss at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (numbers and dates) - I started Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates) a few hours...68 KB (9,844 words) - 18:44, 2 January 2024
- and others answered at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (numbers and dates). So, proposing the updated Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates)...34 KB (5,050 words) - 17:47, 1 November 2022
- talk archives (see top of page links) about similar formats: namely "archive1" (look[ ]for simian), "archive7" and "naming conventions (calendar dates)"...33 KB (5,414 words) - 06:36, 30 January 2023
- to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death). I think that Mel Etitis's approach is fine and certainly allowed by the MoS...37 KB (5,874 words) - 15:34, 4 February 2023
- --GusCaicedo 2006-02-21T13:59-05 GusCaicedo, this is the English Wikipedia, and therefore quite naturally we follow the conventions of English, not other...32 KB (5,082 words) - 17:47, 1 November 2022
- anything mentioned in Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (calendar dates). I didn't sift through the forty-eight archives of this talk page, but if there's...70 KB (11,037 words) - 17:48, 1 November 2022
- User:Docu The discussion is archived at Wikipedia talk: Manual of Style_(dates_and_numbers)/archive48. However there was a doubtful interpretation of what consensus...27 KB (4,105 words) - 17:48, 1 November 2022
- associated with the talk page Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (calendar dates). When I go to that talk page, and click the "project page" tab, I'm redirected...34 KB (5,531 words) - 15:34, 4 February 2023
- the spelling out of numbers (Oxford and Chicago both recommend spelling out "a hundred", but there is no such suggestion here), and therefore we can assume...36 KB (5,638 words) - 17:21, 1 November 2022
- See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Seasons So I think that a new guidline called, "Naming conventions (Seasons)", is unnecessary (Wikipedia:Avoid...2 KB (308 words) - 10:16, 5 March 2022
- Section 1.2 of Manual of Style (dates and numbers), concerns the linkage of dates that contain the months and the day in that month. I would like to propose...31 KB (4,929 words) - 15:35, 4 February 2023
- suggests that many editors do not understand this convention, and are therefore presenting incorrect dates to readers. Also, a date in a non-numeric format...248 KB (37,625 words) - 15:52, 4 February 2023
- names of the date entry pages themselves? (d) Dates only in particular circumstances, e.g., birth and death dates in a biographical entry? Tannin 02:18...26 KB (4,505 words) - 17:07, 1 November 2022
- from technical or naming conventions, as in the division names – we're writing English, and should use English words like "second" and "third". Some articles...34 KB (5,311 words) - 17:19, 1 November 2022
- talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/archive6. There was no proposal at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/vote to use RFC 3339/ISO...35 KB (5,847 words) - 15:35, 4 February 2023
- 23:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Currently, the section reads: Full dates, and days and months, are normally autoformatted, by inserting double square-brackets...49 KB (7,212 words) - 20:07, 28 February 2023
- Somebody kindly brought my attention to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Conventions that says: When dimensions are given, values each number should...265 KB (38,378 words) - 23:38, 2 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/archive dash discussion Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/archive10 User:Chocolateboy/Dashes...33 KB (5,166 words) - 17:47, 1 November 2022
- because that is just a theory and it is not even known when it took place. And it would make for very cumbersome dates. So I suppose ISO just took one...34 KB (5,668 words) - 15:34, 4 February 2023
- want to document agreed conventions on how to go about naming pages? Hesperian 06:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC) Yes to guidance and agreement on the principle
- grows in size. Archiving as a subpage like "/Archive 1" is much better, even more so if the archiving conventions are standardized and same for every
- even the dates isn't that good a guideline! I was looking for something yesterday and knew the date of the edit but it was not in that archive but the