Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:MOSACCESS" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility (redirect from MOSACCESS)One thing I can't see covered by the MOS is the matter of text size in images. There has been a trend in recent years for more and more information to...24 KB (2,127 words) - 15:30, 13 August 2024
- and is sometimes even staler than this draft). Also get input from WT:MOSACCESS, on ensuring that key information is not "hidden" from sight-impaired...26 KB (3,560 words) - 01:05, 16 March 2024
- the shades to be WCAG-compliant. But check with the WT:WPACCESS and WT:MOSACCESS crowd. I'm not certain that the table above this RfC is accurate; what...52 KB (6,433 words) - 19:37, 5 August 2024
- recommended practice in WP:MOSACCESS. Other editors refuted this claim, stating that no mention of rowspans is found in MOSACCESS. Significant discussion...90 KB (11,396 words) - 20:53, 13 August 2024
- from Klõps, it was pointed out that your proposal did not work under WP:MOSACCESS. So I have no idea where you are getting the claim that "most people actually...187 KB (20,328 words) - 16:00, 3 February 2024
- seen as crucially important, then it should be proposed at WT:MOS (or WT:MOSACCESS or whatever) for inclusion in the actual MoS guidelines – iff there is...75 KB (10,891 words) - 13:18, 5 August 2024
- least discourage (preferably deprecate) the practice. (I will notify WT:MOSACCESS, Help talk:Table, Template talk:Vertical header of this debate.) 𝕁𝕄𝔽...171 KB (23,339 words) - 14:10, 25 May 2024
- need updating after merger, of course. I'm mentioning this here at WT:MOSACCESS because a few years ago, accessibility concerns (I think in regard to...250 KB (35,096 words) - 04:37, 23 March 2023
- 13 December 2017 (UTC) Followup: The dispute now now migrated to WT:MOSACCESS. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 00:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC) The following...199 KB (26,248 words) - 16:53, 21 March 2022
- (UTC) I think we'll have to disagree on that. If there are concerns for MOSACCESS, then this is the correct place to discuss them. I have no idea where...271 KB (38,081 words) - 10:30, 26 May 2022
- ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 09:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC) PS: I mentioned this over at WT:MOSACCESS; it's possible this section should be ported over to that MoS subpage...129 KB (18,198 words) - 16:51, 21 March 2022
- comes to using colors as keys/legends for tabular data; I would ask at WT:MOSACCESS, since this has probably come up before. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:29...197 KB (28,085 words) - 14:12, 4 October 2022
- worse, both as to the inclusion of the sponsorship trivia, and the WP:MOSACCESS-killing rowspan stuff, which also – even for fully-sighted editors – makes...162 KB (22,640 words) - 06:55, 4 February 2023
- about "No." and "Vol." at the main MoS talk page may be of interest to MOSACCESS watchlisters. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 03:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)...251 KB (34,551 words) - 06:47, 17 March 2022
- part of the editorship. Then RfC it here, with notice at WP:VPPOL, WT:MOSACCESS, WT:MOSIMAGE, Help_talk:Image, WT:Image, WT:IMAGEPOL, and anywhere else...477 KB (68,342 words) - 12:41, 16 February 2022
- raised to 91% or whatever, make a well-researched case for doing so at WT:MOSACCESS. Expect that to not actually work, since we all know by now that in any...361 KB (47,409 words) - 22:20, 25 December 2022
- close the discussion. As I understand it, the desire is to adhere to WP:MOSACCESS, but there doesn't seem to be a consensus here for the new color scheme...614 KB (60,345 words) - 21:47, 2 March 2024
- 03:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC) I've dropped a note about this thread at WT:MOSACCESS so hopefully some of the regulars there will be along shortly. But it's...903 KB (110,572 words) - 06:47, 20 March 2024