Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules/header" on Wikipedia
- Documentation This is a special header template for the discussion page Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules....955 bytes (16 words) - 22:27, 10 April 2024
- the rule. Ignore all rules isn't about creating a mechanism for fighting unjust rules through "civil disobedience". In a way, it's not a rule at all, but...125 KB (20,211 words) - 11:27, 31 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules. This page was...70 KB (42 words) - 03:01, 20 June 2024
- read all the discussions in the archives. The closest discussion is Wikipedia_talk:Ignore_all_rules/Archive_14#Suggestion to rename Ignore all rules. What...187 KB (27,349 words) - 08:31, 17 May 2022
- Therefore, we must ignore the rule 'ignore all rules'. But if we ignore the rule 'ignore all rules', then we obey the rule 'ignore all rules'; thus failing...202 KB (29,908 words) - 14:33, 30 May 2022
- most important point of "ignore all rules" is what happens when you ignore all rules. Rules are simply the best way we all have agreed on to get things...205 KB (30,545 words) - 20:37, 2 March 2023
- perceiving that the Ignore all rules policy is often misunderstood, have written some essays addressing its meaning, and the role that "the rules" play in this...226 KB (32,475 words) - 10:01, 10 March 2023
- The headers I tried before were over the top, maybe, so any other ideas? Newbyguesses - Talk 01:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC) " * Obey every single rule precisely...5 KB (707 words) - 20:33, 28 April 2016
- you can ignore all rules if they prevent improving Wikipedia; the other one says that it must always be obeyed and that the "ignore all rules" policy...121 KB (19,213 words) - 14:56, 4 February 2023
- made that: "Ignore all rules was Wikipedia's first rule to consider" shouldn't it also be mentioned that the given interpretation "If any rule prevents you...202 KB (30,283 words) - 06:44, 6 March 2022
- text says, "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." but the associated sound file says "If the rules prevent you from...205 KB (31,580 words) - 14:40, 28 January 2023
- have to be easy? Can't we ignore that rule, too, or don't we mean it when we say "all" rules? In this case, I see abstract rules about how fluid policy pages...210 KB (31,004 words) - 15:26, 11 November 2023
- (UTC) Ugh. "Ignore all rules" refers to Wikipedia's rules, which is why I don't mind the word being hyperlinked. This ignored all rules of good taste...210 KB (30,763 words) - 11:46, 7 March 2023
- not risk the existence of the rule itself? Which is more important, the need for rules, or the need to ignore-all-rules? Your (forthcoming) answer speaks...202 KB (28,790 words) - 06:42, 30 January 2023
- ""Ignore all rules" does not mean" or ""Ignore all rules" is not" before all of the statements in the second list but removed all of the ""Ignore all rules"...70 KB (10,434 words) - 00:27, 22 May 2022
- ignored regarding accessibility? Jroberson108 (talk) 12:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Graham87. So I guess we can ignore adding the hash as a column header,...24 KB (2,055 words) - 15:06, 18 July 2024
- pages where the Header hierarchy starts with a second-level Header (===). MediaWiki apparently has no trouble with this and just ignores the "hidden" level...72 KB (11,215 words) - 20:43, 22 May 2022
- have to justify it. "Ignore all rules" isn't part of my conduct rules either; it's a corollary of "be bold". "Ignore all rules" is a useful escape for...86 KB (12,860 words) - 04:14, 12 July 2024
- extra clutter just means that editors are less likely to read the header at all. This is especially true when the edit notice that appears when you...32 KB (2,894 words) - 17:24, 18 July 2024
- June 2006 (UTC) The RD header links to the /all page as do the direct calls Wikipedia:Reference desk/all and shortcuts WP:RD/ALL and WP:RD/A. I'm not anxious...71 KB (10,725 words) - 12:50, 10 March 2023
- that to be true. As Wikipedia:Ignore all rules declares, "Wikipedia has a lot of rules. Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to use common
- set of rules on extention, like "tie-break" rule? --Aphaia 10:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) I'm trying to figure out how to balance the rigidity of rules vs. the
- text in the book. Editors who do not adhere to these rules will be warned and, if warnings are ignored, banned. That makes no sense. How do we re-open a