Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules/Archive 3" on Wikipedia
- version ("if rules make you...") from 2002 given space on the page also. Maybe put it in a box with the attribution "Wikipedia Ignore All Rules page 2002-2004"...63 KB (9,733 words) - 14:56, 4 February 2023
- the rule. Ignore all rules isn't about creating a mechanism for fighting unjust rules through "civil disobedience". In a way, it's not a rule at all, but...125 KB (20,211 words) - 11:27, 31 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules. This page was...70 KB (42 words) - 03:01, 20 June 2024
- "Ignore all rules" means. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:What "Ignore all rules" means/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:What "Ignore all rules"...9 KB (48 words) - 02:30, 24 January 2024
- that the Quakers had a "rule" to "ignore all rules" and that Richard Nixon was a Quaker...he really took that "ignore all rules" to heart! Who knows better...57 KB (8,607 words) - 12:04, 4 February 2023
- "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." Example: If disruptive editing (which is a guideline) prevents you from improving...8 KB (931 words) - 07:36, 3 August 2024
- suggested (you should ignore the rule which says to ignore all rules, which leads to a contradiction because if you ignore all rules you don't, etc.). I'm...81 KB (12,608 words) - 06:41, 30 January 2023
- "there're rules and one of them says all the others can be ignored". Indeed have a read at the original spirit of the "Ignore all rules" rule at Wikipedia:Trifecta...131 KB (19,017 words) - 12:22, 6 June 2024
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 105#Update to policy for Wikipedia:Ignore all rules about updating Wikipedia:Ignore all rules to reflect the 5 generally...187 KB (27,349 words) - 08:31, 17 May 2022
- of this proposition. (Read all the archives, anyone?) 01:15, 18 July 2007 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules (→Established as consensus?)...210 KB (31,004 words) - 15:26, 11 November 2023
- Therefore, we must ignore the rule 'ignore all rules'. But if we ignore the rule 'ignore all rules', then we obey the rule 'ignore all rules'; thus failing...202 KB (29,908 words) - 14:33, 30 May 2022
- WP:POINT is a great rule, but it's just one of our many rules here at Wikipedia, the free enyclopedia you can edit. Ignoring all rules is about cutting through...105 KB (15,793 words) - 06:42, 30 January 2023
- The rules are important, but don't obsess over them. After all, sometimes they are wrong. If they prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, ignore them...206 KB (30,808 words) - 12:12, 20 August 2024
- most important point of "ignore all rules" is what happens when you ignore all rules. Rules are simply the best way we all have agreed on to get things...205 KB (30,545 words) - 20:37, 2 March 2023
- text says, "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." but the associated sound file says "If the rules prevent you from...205 KB (31,580 words) - 14:40, 28 January 2023
- word "all" seems really awkward. I can't conceive of any potential situation where literally ignoring either "all rules" or some particular rules (such...222 KB (31,758 words) - 15:28, 11 November 2023
- made that: "Ignore all rules was Wikipedia's first rule to consider" shouldn't it also be mentioned that the given interpretation "If any rule prevents you...202 KB (30,283 words) - 06:44, 6 March 2022
- quality, ignore them. Short and sweet. Wikipedia:Suggestions on how to ignore all rules explains the basic philosophy behind Ignore All Rules. --The Cunctator...210 KB (30,763 words) - 11:46, 7 March 2023
- not risk the existence of the rule itself? Which is more important, the need for rules, or the need to ignore-all-rules? Your (forthcoming) answer speaks...202 KB (28,790 words) - 06:42, 30 January 2023
- archived. Why not create subpages entitled Wikipedia:Ignore all rules/Supporters, Wikipedia:Ignore all rules/Opposition, Wikipedia:Ignore all rules/Interpretations...202 KB (29,043 words) - 20:38, 2 March 2023
- it to level 3. /82.212.68.183 10:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC) I removed the new section link. Level 3 headers are needed to simplify archival. :) —{admin}
- realize that all three active bureaucrats have !voted, but since the consensus is rather obvious, I expect those bureaucrats to ignore all rules and close
- Wikibooks:General voting rules with the version 5 text. We can also mark the other 4 versions, and the current text of Wikibooks:General voting rules/Proposal with