Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Good articles/Archive 11" on Wikipedia
- discussed at WikiProject Good Articles instead of here, since that is the wikiproject that oversees the GA program as a whole. Dr. Cash 18:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)...549 KB (44,497 words) - 16:14, 16 October 2023
- further guidance on how to proceed. --slambo 20:11, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Personally, I would see good articles not really as a stepping stone on the path...112 KB (18,050 words) - 06:43, 30 January 2023
- discussion page for good article nominations (GAN) and the good articles process in general. To ask a question or start a discussion about the good article nomination...15 KB (1,687 words) - 15:58, 25 July 2024
- the WikiProject Good Articles newsletters here. Great job on your first issue! It looks really great. You know, I saw those articles I had reviewed up...23 KB (3,430 words) - 09:30, 4 February 2023
- C679 12:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Results: Geography of Madagascar - 4 Adventure Galley - will be archived Good old days - will be archived National stereotypes...97 KB (10,025 words) - 12:53, 4 February 2023
- to the GA process broadly are happening at Wikipedia talk:Good articles or Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Should we mark this project as inactive/defunct...6 KB (683 words) - 23:16, 27 January 2023
- language "Add {{good article}} to the article, which places a tiny support symbol at the top right corner" from Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations. Melchoir...32 KB (5,271 words) - 10:58, 31 March 2022
- This archive is for conversations whose last comment was 15 April 2006 and at least a week old. How about a rule saying that articles at the top must be...30 KB (4,870 words) - 10:28, 26 May 2022
- reliable; do you still think they're a good idea? Do you feel that an archive is necessary? -- Creidieki 00:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC) Just a thought, but...75 KB (11,375 words) - 17:48, 31 October 2021
- -- Avi 20:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC) Should articles be peer reviewed before they are nominated for Good Article status? I submitted a Good Article nomination...121 KB (18,174 words) - 16:47, 15 April 2023
- about finding "good articles", even a partial editor can consider "his"/"her" article bad, but no editor should pass "his"/"her" articles. What do you think...96 KB (15,310 words) - 13:39, 17 October 2021
- 06:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC) The main problem why there're so many uncategorized good articles is that it's not in the instructions! Perhaps a good way...67 KB (9,603 words) - 21:09, 2 March 2023
- IvoShandor 08:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the comments; I've decided to not care about Good Articles any more, and instead strive to be as good as possible...566 KB (91,668 words) - 06:43, 30 January 2023
- changes to articles can be seen there. In fact, if a topic moves from good to featured or vice versa, then the importance of the articles in the topic...62 KB (8,787 words) - 14:46, 4 February 2023
- the stream of good quality articles. As for specifying society -- I was thinking of a footnote. Putting some key topics in parens is good idea. I'll build...33 KB (5,336 words) - 03:26, 7 October 2021
- marked as inactive. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 11:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC) That sounds like a good idea as well. However, I would wait until we have...103 KB (13,326 words) - 02:06, 1 June 2023
- fiction (or "fancruft" and good article status, I 'copy and pasted' the discussion from the Good Article talk page in "Archive 2" onto this page (which...64 KB (10,396 words) - 23:38, 9 April 2024
- discussion is closed and will soon be archived. Hello @AFI ping list and others (anyone can participate!): The following articles have been randomly chosen from...89 KB (9,235 words) - 22:47, 5 May 2022
- what a good article doesn't need. For example, how it is different from Featured articles. That is one thing that confuses me. Wrad 00:21, 11 April 2007...653 KB (100,365 words) - 00:35, 5 June 2022
- edits should be made to this discussion. REMOVED 2 articles - 5-0 support, 22 days Carlwev (talk) 13:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC) The following discussion is closed...73 KB (9,748 words) - 12:10, 4 February 2023
- Wikisource talk:WikiProject DNB (Archives) I just looked deeper at {{textinfo}} and can see that we should be using more components rather than ticking
- is a proposal for restructuring this archive to group into kept, deleted, and to-be-deleted sections, with articles being listed in each in alphabetical
- the previous nomination, if it can be found in the archives, is a good idea too. The Wikibooks:Good books page is just a proposal right now, but if we