Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Footnote4" on Wikipedia
- This system is already in use, so I decided it should be documented. It is very quick and easy to convert to other older systems such as fn/fnb (Wikipedia:Footnote2)...2 KB (231 words) - 23:22, 8 July 2005
- currently subject to many experiments. For example, my own Wikipedia:Footnote4 is now obsolete due to changes to footnote3 (which has now become the...16 KB (2,440 words) - 13:39, 18 July 2021
- Rd232 22:28, 6 May 2005 (UTC) How does this all compare with Wikipedia:Footnote4 my own manually numbered footnote system? Can we unify them and delete...126 KB (19,637 words) - 15:53, 4 February 2023
- footnotes and the mn/mnb for actual references. The latter is Wikipedia:Footnote4, which I've discovered is defunct and used on only a few articles. However...138 KB (20,190 words) - 10:03, 21 March 2023
- Mozzerati 18:42, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC) Okay, now written up in Wikipedia:Footnote4. This is quite BOLD, let's gain some experience with it before pushing...79 KB (12,667 words) - 15:53, 4 February 2023
- numbered semantically linked systems under development such as Wikipedia:Footnote4. Mozzerati 21:24, 2005 May 20 (UTC) Wikipedia is an amazing resource....73 KB (11,930 words) - 14:26, 4 February 2023
- ({{ref}}/{{note}}) and WP:CITESHORT. I think I updated all uses of WP:Footnote2 and WP:Footnote4 a year ago as well as some other really odd stuff. REFPUNC would not apply...138 KB (19,560 words) - 15:53, 4 February 2023