Search results

Copied from Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard I trired to re-read the discussion above and the policy itself, it comes to my mind that a good deal...

...between articles on the fringe subject and those where the fringe subject appears within a mainstream setting is very important. Please tell me here...

(discussion moved to Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Booth_Escaped — Preceding unsigned comment added by NJGW (talk • contribs) 02:49, 12 November...

I think we should create a guideline on distinguishing fringe journals from reputable ones, e.g. based on impact factor. What do others think? Everymorning...

scientific community generally does not take the time to literally label every fringe theory a pseudoscience in a specific announcement. However, the scientific...

what it means to be fringe, I'm starting to wonder to what extent WP:FRINGE actually operates as an independent guideline. If FRINGE did not exist, I think...

This section currently starts out: The best sources to use when describing fringe theories ... are independent reliable sources. I'm not sure this is totally...

"[2] according to User:HealthyGirl. Who is correct according to Wikipedia:Fringe theories#Independent sources or does WP:FRIND need to be more specific to...

quackery that liberates suckers from their money). A fringe group calling another group "fringe" is basically just noise and can safely be utterly ignored...

theories. Fringe is Fringe. I think the current wording is due to the fact that the policy was originally created due to issues over fringe science, and...

Under "Identifying fringe theories" we have "We use the term fringe theory in a very broad sense to describe ideas that depart significantly from the prevailing...

23:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC) There is currently a debate at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#RfC: Should there be advice to notify an article if...

MBisanz talk 13:13, 5 January 2008 Hello fellow Wikipedians interested in Fringe topics - wanted to let you know that some of us are attempting to revitalize...

Hmm...does WP:FRINGE contradict itself slightly? At one point, it says that a fringe theory is notable enough if referenced extensively in a serious manner...

and a few comments. To start with the good news, the conclusion "Where WP:FRINGE is abused" is excellent and only needs a bit of expansion. The arguments...

There's a lot of confusion over fringe theories. There's confusion on whether it means "fringe science" or just "fringe theories" in general. There's confusion...

installed, however. Specifically, he was involved in a content dispute at a fringe article, came over here and added this clause, then went back to the content...

Generally, these people tend to be editors who have edited articles in fringe subjects that do not take WP:UNDUE, WP:REDFLAG, WP:NOT, etc. seriously....

statement, which is also contained in the "Fringe theory in a nutshell" at the top of the page: 1. "A fringe theory can be considered notable if it has...

organizations, people, concepts or aspects of a fringe theory, and the fringe theory itself. An article on a fringe topic is an article where the most significant...