Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Archives/2014/March

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I'd be very grateful if one or two of the admins that frequent DRV could consider closing reviews rather then participating in discussions. I don't think I should close any more DRVs as I haven't been meaningfully active for a very long time and, even when I have been around, I have closed few reviews recently because I have felt too involved/non-neutral to do the ones available. My patience levels are also at record low levels and I can no longer bite my tongue when I see stuff that I don't agree with. Perhaps I should consider a name change to Spartazthegrump? Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I was going to close Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Indiggo. Having never closed a deletion review before, I took a look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Closing_reviews. I describes what to do at a high-level, but doesn't describe the low-level mechanics; i.e. what templates you need to add or delete to get the review page into the final state. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

• Roy, I use a script in my monobook to close DRVs. You can add it to your monobook by adding importScript('User:Lifebaka/closedrv.js'); to a new line. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Cool, thanks. I will install that, and then attempt to address the issue you brought up in your grumpyness below :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Mercy buckets I'll go delay my request at CHU! Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)