Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Archive 1" on Wikipedia
- can not see deleted pages. Let's consider the person challenging a hasty deletion has seen the page and consider the page should be kept. He then comes here...14 KB (2,520 words) - 13:07, 14 June 2006
- The deletion review process now requires us to manually copy and paste a series of templates onto several pages in order to start a review. This is quite...26 KB (3,215 words) - 23:32, 22 June 2024
- Pushing to 1.0 discussions Archive 1 · Objections archive Archive 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 (Sep - Dec 2005) Archive 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 (Jan - May 2006) Archive 10 · 11 ·...4 KB (393 words) - 23:32, 22 June 2024
- than 1 week. If it is agreed to be deleted, delete it (and remove from this page. If not, move the discussion to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/archive. Thanks...89 KB (14,877 words) - 19:54, 28 February 2023
- Archive of "when should we use seperate /deletion pages, as opposed to headers, and should they be further edited?" If you find any other pages which...24 KB (4,242 words) - 16:21, 4 June 2020
- 16:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Starting with the December 1 log we'll archive deletion reviews directly on the log page, using {{drt}} and {{drb}}, similar...67 KB (9,938 words) - 16:50, 13 March 2023
- --ssd 03:46, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC) Perhaps speedy deletion, but coupled with instant undeletion if it is contested later? Angela. 12:21, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)...93 KB (14,143 words) - 13:16, 4 February 2023
- discussion' have in the past been reviewed at deletion review, even when the relevant discussions did not involve deletion. The awkwardness of this situation...78 KB (11,075 words) - 06:57, 17 June 2024
- ♠ 00:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia:Archived deletion discussions → Wikipedia:Archived articles for deletion discussions – Wikipedia does not consist...11 KB (1,170 words) - 22:37, 13 September 2022
- the votes for deletion page. That's not a very consensus-driven approach, and since, unlike The Cunctator, I regularly review the deletion log, it's not...84 KB (13,943 words) - 13:39, 4 February 2023
- are expired to the archive or the deletion queue, but I am not sure what to do with the listings for Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Otheruses1...105 KB (16,232 words) - 20:07, 3 May 2022
- still have to manually archive finished days into Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February (soon Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 March) and a plea...119 KB (18,019 words) - 01:58, 27 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Proposals: Create a new process, Wikipedia:Administrative action review (XRV), that will determine whether an...14 KB (1,728 words) - 23:38, 7 July 2024
- (UTC) The problem with deletion review is that 1) all the people who had Simple Green on their watchlist can't see the review. That's why we have AfDs...52 KB (7,900 words) - 13:47, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 April 30 still has an open DRV, but it doesn't appear on Wikipedia:Deletion review. It's open in the archives, too. (I...9 KB (1,156 words) - 12:38, 21 March 2022
- Jan 31, 2005 (UTC) Yeah? Did you bother to check the archives? See Wikipedia:Peer_review/Archive_1#List_of_women_poets. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:38, 31 Jan...52 KB (8,379 words) - 22:37, 21 March 2023
- it's only intended for reviewing speedy deletions. Where does one need to go for reviewing other deletions? ◅ Sebastian 12:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Does...6 KB (847 words) - 00:45, 28 July 2021
- {{archive top}}, sometimes with {{subst:archive top}}. If closed with {{archive top}}, the bot changes this into {{tl|archive top}} in the archive so...52 KB (7,213 words) - 17:01, 13 August 2023
- WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC) FYI, The encyclopedia that anyone can edit has been nominated for deletion. 70...73 KB (9,057 words) - 05:42, 4 February 2023
- time to archive the entry for Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Computer and video games, but it doesn't follow the format set up for the normal CVG peer reviews. How...6 KB (840 words) - 00:27, 21 June 2021
- need to exclude self promotion, review Wikisource:Proposed deletions/Archives for history of self promotion deletions) (talk) 11:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- used for review of keep/no consensus closes. In my opinion, that's a process error, leading to less review, not more, because deletion reviews are always
- for deletion/Book --> Wikibooks:Votes for deletion/Book (Archive) & deleting the redirect. If it gets nominated again, Wikibooks:Votes for deletion/Book