Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Bot Approvals Group/Archive 1" on Wikipedia
- question. Might I ask the Bot Approvals group to suggest a next step? Personally I think that if a bot does not conform to bot requirements, and if further...6 KB (868 words) - 16:56, 21 March 2023
- bot approvals group need get their bot approved by someone else. Sounds sensible encase of any flaws/problems are not noticed by the owner of the bot...46 KB (6,439 words) - 05:04, 27 March 2023
- excluded approval under the old system. Snowolf How can I help? 20:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC) see Wikipedia talk:Bots/Approvals group/Archive 4#My hat's...215 KB (28,307 words) - 10:07, 21 March 2023
- Requests to join the Bot Approvals Group are currently made here, although other methods have been proposed. Users wishing to join BAG, or to nominate...8 KB (743 words) - 16:22, 1 May 2024
- involved with the bot approvals process in a more substantial way. However, they are discouraged by the fact that entry into this "approvals group" is too bureaucratic...97 KB (13,541 words) - 06:58, 30 January 2023
- to the Bot Approvals Group. The support was unanimous so I feel that closing this and announcing ST47 as a member of the Bot Approvals Group is uncontentious...178 KB (27,796 words) - 09:47, 10 March 2023
- bot flags leaves all the work to the bureaucrats, when it could easily be done by the approvals group. There are two pages, Wikipedia:Requested bot flags...76 KB (10,881 words) - 08:29, 3 April 2023
- matters at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Approvals_group/Archive_5#Opinions_Wanted, Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Archive_4#Review_of_a_Betacommand_task...213 KB (33,552 words) - 10:05, 21 March 2023
- Approvals Group Anomie: 2011-10-26T02:16:55Z to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AnomieBOT 58 Jarry1250: 2011-10-24T16:03:08Z to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests...193 KB (25,376 words) - 13:10, 4 February 2023
- are asking, this is about the Bot Approvals Group - for more general bot/operator discussions please see Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. — xaosflux Talk 21:26...137 KB (18,344 words) - 16:22, 1 May 2024
- discussion about bot approvals, WT:BOTPOL is for discussions about the Bot policy, WT:BAG is for discussion by and about the Bot Approvals Group (this discussion...201 KB (20,872 words) - 08:04, 3 April 2023
- go about approving bots. When a bot is approved an approvals member places the new entry at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval#Approved Requests. When...87 KB (13,017 words) - 23:10, 25 March 2023
- active approvals group we all know to watch this page. Since bots are linked in the approvals section when approved (with the needed link to the approval etc)...72 KB (10,616 words) - 13:52, 10 March 2023
- William 14:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Since this is a cross post, I would suggest discussing changes to BAG on Wikipedia talk:Bots/Approvals group and leave discussions...155 KB (23,403 words) - 04:57, 3 April 2023
- a member of the approvals group will allow or deny the bot (a bot flag can be applied for after this second approval). A core group of experienced Wikipedians...79 KB (11,486 words) - 18:45, 30 April 2022
- non-bot. ;-) —bender235 (talk) 23:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Hello! I invite you to comment on my BAG (Bot Approvals Group) nomination: Wikipedia:Bot Approvals...84 KB (11,082 words) - 15:36, 9 March 2023
- approvals - but am fine with expansion. — xaosflux Talk 19:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC) We now have WP:BAGG. We now have WP:HIDEAWB. Wikipedia talk:Bot...30 KB (3,228 words) - 18:29, 24 January 2024
- contributors who think they may need a bot account but are not sure to ask at the approval request page and allow the approvals group to decide, which I believe to...166 KB (24,820 words) - 15:25, 29 March 2022
- WP:VPM, WT:BOT, and WP:BON. I am requesting to join the Bot Approvals Group and my request can be found here: Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/HighInBC...143 KB (19,724 words) - 13:10, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Bot_policy#Appeals_and_reexamination_of_approvals, this is where bots are re-assessed. Yet neither the bot author or any of the bot approvals group have...71 KB (9,334 words) - 06:57, 30 January 2023
- of pages, and produce a characteristic "1. 1. 1. 1." when transcluded. I suppose these could be found by bot. I'm currently unclear, speaking of the bottom
- validation to this community guideline, I'm still a bit peeved on how the bot policy discussion process was shortcuted, if this is a similar case and someone