Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:BLOCK" on Wikipedia
- TPA revocation for “proxying while blocked” (permalink) there was discussion about what it is acceptable for a blocked user to post on their user talk page...60 KB (9,054 words) - 01:52, 19 August 2024
- Wikipedia:Block log/Archive1: 24 Nov 2003 to Mar 25, 2004 Wikipedia:Block log/Archive2: March 25 to 28 September, 2004 Wikipedia:Block log/Archive 3: 28...33 KB (4,767 words) - 22:10, 17 July 2024
- temporary IP block exemption for an event that is taking place today in an African country from a user that I completely trust. (IP blocks of open proxies...25 KB (3,685 words) - 15:56, 18 July 2024
- Anti-Harassment Tools team at the WMF will start building these granular blocking tools in a few weeks and we've asked WMF designer Alex Hollender to help...64 KB (9,405 words) - 12:53, 20 April 2021
- (UTC) Moved to WP:VPP § RfC: Can editors request community review of the blocks of others? – AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 07:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Discussion has...17 KB (2,249 words) - 15:24, 30 June 2024
- January 2008 (UTC) I don't know. Presumably, once the blocks are in fact done, a review of my block log of the IPs in question will show what the IPs are...84 KB (12,090 words) - 13:09, 4 February 2023
- proposed protocol and the existing Wikipedia:Blocking policy? A1: No change in blocking policy -- when blocks are appropriate -- is intended or implied....27 KB (521 words) - 03:49, 12 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy/Bans and blocks Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy/Clarity in Policy Discussion - whether admins may decide the merit of legitimate...117 KB (18,523 words) - 18:13, 14 July 2024
- rights · rights log · block log · checkuser (log) · review permissions) Wiki Education supported student editor in China. Six-month block exemption granted...176 KB (2,538 words) - 00:52, 18 July 2024
- merged into some sort of WP:Global stuff page, with whitelisting in the block policy. Mr.Z-man 01:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC) I'd think it should stay here...6 KB (785 words) - 19:08, 10 March 2023
- has been proposed by User:Shultz IV: Users may not be blocked simply because they have been blocked on foreign Wikipedias, since their affairs are to stay...131 KB (20,317 words) - 14:59, 28 January 2023
- Jimbo is talking about plagiarism. I doubt he'd ever want to see a user blocked for inadvertently misusing a fair-use image, for example, or for disputing...254 KB (37,936 words) - 15:01, 8 May 2023
- people do not shun away from serious disruption only to have themselves blocked, rather than taking responsibility for themselves of how much time they...15 KB (2,177 words) - 20:31, 11 March 2023
- never blocked except by Jimbo. Then we added the provision that users whose only edits were vandalism could be blocked (e.g. WoW). Then we added blocks to...89 KB (13,764 words) - 13:09, 4 February 2023
- The key issue is not blocks per se, but a pattern of escalating blocks in a power play to drive the editor off Wikipedia. I believe that an editor who...8 KB (1,260 words) - 04:13, 20 September 2020
- ideals, but they don't address the specific details which triggered the block. What is the value of a promise of good behaviour that is written by a bot...6 KB (482 words) - 19:59, 15 August 2024
- admins blocks under the 5 Block Rule without prior discussion (although the blocking admin can reverse their own block). A user blocked under the 5 Block Rule...19 KB (2,879 words) - 01:11, 20 February 2023
- A new proposal has been written to allow admins to block people that make frequent personal attacks (but only if the admin is an uninvolved party). Please...109 KB (17,792 words) - 13:08, 4 February 2023
- I don't like "Are you the victim of an unfair partial block? You may ask for review here." - it reads to me more like a bad lawyer ad. I'd suggest changing...3 KB (357 words) - 06:00, 19 November 2023
- user was blocked to begin with. It's kind of hard to evauate an appela when neither the blocked user nor the reviewing admin can see why the block was placed...250 KB (33,501 words) - 11:28, 25 May 2022
- I noticed that the beginnings of the blocking policy were written over six months ago with no discussion. I thougth I would begin the discussion. As an
- Now Blocking policy is official. It is weird since we agreed on that already in the late 2005 (see /Archives/2007-04), though. Anyway, thank you for your
- new section to the policy, located before the section Justifications for blocking. This is a very rough draft, with changes, comments, and revisions encouraged
- Swept in from the pub According to meta:IP block exempt, administrators get this right, making it redundant in administrators. At least two users, including
- {{unblock}} requests can be a form of vandalism, and may warrant an infinite block and protected user talk: page. – Mike.lifeguard | talk 15:44, 12 October