Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology/Proposed decision
Case clerks: Penwhale (Talk) & Ks0stm (Talk) Drafting arbitrator: David Fuchs (Talk)
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
This page has been blanked as a courtesy. The Arbitration Committee's decision is still in effect, and can be viewed at the main case page. The contents of this page can be viewed in the page history. |
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology/Proposed decision page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology/Proposed decision" page.