Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/January

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Proposals, January 2015

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Ennominae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split off some of the larger tribes:

Dawynn (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Tachinidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose {{Tachina-stub}} / ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Tachina stubs. Should pull some 80 articles out of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Tachinidae stubs. Dawynn (talk) 12:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I agree. Doing that would bring the category under 800. I agree. Go ahead. Gug01 (talk) 23:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Pennsylvania election stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose creating {{Pennsylvania-election-stub}} / ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Pennsylvania election stubs. Between Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh, should have more than 75 pages. This will bring ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:United States election stubs back under 800. Dawynn (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Peru geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following as speedy splits:

Dawynn (talk) 12:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Lithosiinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following to help reduce the size of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Lithosiinae stubs

Dawynn (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Miaenia stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Miaenia stubs / {{Miaenia-stub}} to be split from ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Acanthocinini stubs. Will pick up about 80 pages, and bring the parent back under 800. Dawynn (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If any editor disagrees, fine. But I think it would be good to create the Category:Miaenia stubs. Please go ahead and create it. Gug01 (talk) 23:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Siluriformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following new templates and categories.

Dawynn (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Kentucky Derby stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Kentucky Derby stubs/{{KentuckyDerby-stub}}, as a subcat of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Horse race stubs, ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Kentucky sport stubs and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Louisville, Kentucky stubs (although the last 2 may be replaced by ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Louisville, Kentucky sport stubs) - a quick scan finds 91 stubs here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Basically no objection. Creating something like ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Louisville, Kentucky sport stubs/{{Louisville-sport-stub}} was on my to-do list anyway. It just seems to me that both that and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Kentucky Derby stubs/{{KentuckyDerby-stub}} would end up on this set of stubs, although certainly both {{Kentucky-sport-stub}} and {{Louisville-stub}} would be removed in the sorting. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 10:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have been working on US state sport stub types (see many of my recent Category: and Template: namespace edits, as well as my AWB's account's recent edits); and I've proposed per-city types below, which ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Louisville, Kentucky sport stubs would be included in. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:New York City sport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:New York sport stubs is getting close to 400 stubs (and may pass it before I'm done populating it); the clearest viable subcat would be ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:New York City sport stubs/{{NYC-sport-stub}}, which is getting close to 200]. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANd while we're at it, any other city with a city-level stub category and enough sports stubs to justify a category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1910s film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating two new tags: {{1910s-short-comedy-film-stub}} and {{1910s-short-drama-film-stub}}, along with the corresponding categories. A quick catscan shows that there are about 286 articles included in both ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:1910s comedy film stubs and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Short silent comedy film stubs, plus 220 articles that are included in both ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:1910s drama film stubs and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Short silent drama film stubs. Since the decade categories are overpopulated, the new stub tags would allow the articles to still be tagged as short films and by decade, but with only one stub tag. Please see the discussion here. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Sesioidea stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting by family. Templates first, categories if article count > 60.

Dawynn (talk) 12:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Syria geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split according to the 14 governorates. Propose creating all templates, but only categories with sufficient article counts.

Dawynn (talk) 03:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Acentropinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following templates and categories:

Dawynn (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Zealand speedy proposals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following:

These will bring oversized category ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:New Zealand people stubs back under 800. Dawynn (talk) 10:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cincinnati, Ohio sport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Cincinnati, Ohio sport stubs/{{Cincinnati-sport-stub}} - this should pick up many pages from oversized ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Ohio sport stubs, as well as ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Cincinnati Reds season stubs‎ (51 stubs). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Propose ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Megachile stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose new ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Megachile stubs. This will mostly just shift the overload status on ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:bee stubs to a new category. But this will isolate this one very large genus into its own category. Expect around 1500 articles under the new tag. Dawynn (talk) 04:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/January&oldid=1074062298"