Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/USS Constitution

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

USS Constitution

This article recently had a GAR and passed. I've covered all of the suggestions given in the GAR as well as reworking all the references. The exception at this point is the book by Fitz-Enz; I'm awaiting the book to become available in my library network; at this time I cannot supply the needed page numbers. Redlink fill-ins are ongoing with help from Benea (talk · contribs) in regards to the Royal Navy ships. Of course the ultimate goal will be FAC so I hope this review will shake out more MOS and other overlooked issues. --Brad (talk) 22:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Tenative Support I've been watching you improve this article for nearly 9 months now, so far as i am aware everything has and remains good, but I will take another look when I have a spare moment to ensure that all the i's are dotted and t's crossed with regards to A-class. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, after rereading the article I am giving full support gor the bump to A-class. Well done! TomStar810 (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Tentative Support - per Tom. I'll take a look in a few days once the weekend gives me a bit more available time. -MBK₀₀₄ 15:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've just read through the article, checked the images and references. All looks good. As the MOS issues (spacing, access, etc) are not my specialty, I did not check those things, but there are some people who are knowledgeable who will definitely let you know about the problems at FAC. -MBK₀₀₄ 18:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Beautiful article. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:19, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment References satisfy MoS. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:19, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Excellent article. One comment...I thought that a year ago or so I added a couple of sentences about a recent captain of the ship being relieved and charged with abusing his crew? What happened to that text? Cla68 (talk) 03:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The mention is in the very last paragraph of the article. --Brad (talk) 13:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.