Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:WikiProject Bible/Biblical criticism work group/Assessment" on Wikipedia
- the assessment department of the Biblical Criticism WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles on biblical criticism...6 KB (2,910 words) - 02:20, 11 November 2021
- NOTE: Biblical criticism is NOT about attacking the Bible: that would be Criticism of the Bible, which is where criticisms are made against the Bible as...10 KB (1,070 words) - 19:10, 6 May 2020
- WikiProject Bible Welcome to the assessment department of the Bible WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Bible...6 KB (1,027 words) - 15:25, 16 October 2020
- WikiProject Bible Work groups are informal groups of editors gathered for collaborative work on a particular topic within the field of Bible; all project...430 bytes (49 words) - 10:51, 22 January 2011
- these articles. WikiProject Religious texts Biblical criticism work group - dealing with content specifically relating to Biblical criticism There is now...18 KB (2,028 words) - 17:04, 21 April 2024
- WikiProject Bible If you would like to be a member of the project, sign your name below, after the last signee, with "# ~~~~" (four tildes) Members can...21 KB (2,320 words) - 00:16, 28 June 2024
- Ishmael Mark 10 Melchizedek priesthood Nimrod Pishon Textual criticism «Top» Bible Buffet Biblical apocrypha «Top» Davidic line Gnosticism and the New Testament...81 KB (3,952 words) - 14:58, 31 March 2015
- criticism Bible Buffet Biblical apocrypha Davidic line Gnosticism and the New Testament Manasseh of Judah New Testament Nimrod Noah Patriarchs (Bible)...54 KB (3,574 words) - 14:57, 31 March 2015
- criticism Bible Buffet Biblical apocrypha Davidic line Gnosticism and the New Testament Manasseh of Judah New Testament Nimrod Noah Patriarchs (Bible)...54 KB (3,574 words) - 14:57, 31 March 2015
- Universalism work group. Parent projects are WikiProject Religion and WikiProject Christianity. Please contribute any thoughts you have to make this project better...12 KB (1,085 words) - 08:37, 4 July 2024
- WikiProject Bible Shortcut WP:XC The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of...4 KB (426 words) - 01:24, 12 January 2021
- Archaeology and the Bible*; Architecture* - General Survey; Assyria; Babylonia*; Bible*; Bible Translations*; Biblical criticism; Birds*; Burial*; Canaan...440 KB (58,382 words) - 01:06, 5 January 2024
- Shortcut WP:BIBLE/O WikiProject Bible The Outreach Department of the Bible WikiProject is a centralized workarea for project recruitment and member interaction...3 KB (74 words) - 10:51, 22 January 2011
- WikiProject Bible...6 KB (2 words) - 15:35, 15 April 2022
- separate WikiBible, or a Bible project within Wikibooks; either way, reproductions and interpretations of Biblical text should be part of a "sister project" somewhere...57 KB (8,265 words) - 11:17, 24 March 2023
- Welcome to the assessment department of the Christianity WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Christianity related...16 KB (3,612 words) - 00:41, 15 August 2023
- WikiProject Bible If you'd like to encourage work on a particular stub, add it to the bottom of the relevant list. Category:Bible stubs stub_one...215 bytes (26 words) - 21:31, 21 August 2016
- Feminist criticism (Aug 2008) Rosie's Place (Jan 2009) Shere Hite (Aug 2009) Nawal El Saadawi (Jan 2010) Biblical wedding (Feb 2010) Biblical wedding (Mar...29 KB (1,214 words) - 14:40, 31 March 2015
- theology*; Bible and the poor*; Hermeneutical consciousness in scholarly exegesis*; Criticism of churches*; [[Biblical theology – Biblical theology in...676 KB (75,606 words) - 12:30, 20 September 2022
- are other WikiProjects that fall within our scope. Anabaptist work group Christianity in China work group Core topics work group WikiProject Christianity...1 KB (76 words) - 06:10, 26 February 2021
- include nearly any form of criticism posted on the internet, including some of your criticisms of various individual and groups, whose sympathizers seem
- to make a concrete assessment. The concern here is not the original work, and there is no reason at present to assume the 1915 work was extensively edited