Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 32,287
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Wikipedia:Verifiable, not verified" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • policy, Wikipedia:Verifiability, previously defined the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia as "verifiability, not truth". "Verifiability" was used in this...
    27 KB (3,935 words) - 20:03, 20 June 2024
  • The key to Wikipedia:Verifiability is whether another person is able to verify that at least one reliable source has previously published each claim made...
    3 KB (445 words) - 18:08, 23 May 2024
  • may not be possible to find a published reliable source, and the material therefore may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, you...
    35 KB (3,874 words) - 18:25, 7 July 2024
  • This essay, verifiable but not false, relates to limiting false information in Wikipedia. For years, Wikipedia's policy on verifiability had stated: "The...
    5 KB (802 words) - 02:16, 16 March 2023
  • Wikipedia is truth, not verifiability, i.e. whether reliable sources state it to be true; not whether individual editors think they can verify it themselves...
    2 KB (194 words) - 19:25, 19 June 2021
  • policy, Wikipedia:Verifiability, used to define the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia as "verifiability, not truth". "Verifiability" was used in this...
    5 KB (667 words) - 19:54, 21 October 2023
  • and think the line is not verifiable, then go to another online source that they consider verifiable or to have been verified by a reliable authority...
    5 KB (770 words) - 18:22, 31 March 2022
  • information in Wikipedia must be verifiable, but because other policies and guidelines also influence content, verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. The...
    9 KB (1,046 words) - 20:48, 7 April 2012
  • challenge? A verifiability challenge is any good-faith claim that unsourced material cannot be verified in any reliable source. What is not a challenge...
    3 KB (401 words) - 21:18, 10 June 2016
  • 20 July 2012 (UTC) Oppose. Can something be verifiable but inaccurate? I would say not. It can be verified that a source says something, and if it does...
    18 KB (51,046 words) - 08:20, 25 January 2022
  • be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them. Verifiable sources may have...
    3 KB (474 words) - 20:13, 18 February 2023
  • material that lacks sufficient sources to satisfy Wikipedia's verifiability policy. It is not intended to provide any guidance on article deletion, except...
    10 KB (1,221 words) - 05:42, 5 April 2024
  • which cannot be verified. Therefore: Verifiability is one problem with articles on obscure subjects. By concentrating on verifiable subjects, we also...
    1 KB (86 words) - 21:51, 5 September 2006
  • Although all content must be verifiable, not all content must be actually verified by citation to a reliable source. You do not normally need to cite a source...
    202 bytes (208 words) - 17:44, 24 April 2013
  • articles must be verifiable in a reliable, published source, even if not already verified via an inline citation. The verifiability policy says that an...
    34 KB (3,896 words) - 05:15, 3 July 2024
  • 20 July 2012 (UTC) Oppose. Can something be verifiable but inaccurate? I would say not. It can be verified that a source says something, and if it does...
    366 KB (48,896 words) - 17:00, 23 April 2022
  • in the article? Yes: do not delete, remove the RFV tag, consider placing a {{Refimprove}} or other Citation and verifiability maintenance template No...
    5 KB (348 words) - 11:25, 14 April 2022
  • Although all content must be verifiable, not all content must be actually verified by citation to a reliable source. You do not normally need to cite a source...
    202 bytes (208 words) - 14:05, 29 April 2013
  • Although all content must be verifiable, not all content must be actually verified by citation to a reliable source. You do not normally need to cite a source...
    202 bytes (208 words) - 16:33, 25 April 2013
  • Wikipedia:Citation underkill (category Wikipedia essays about verification)
    left behind is not misplaced. If you delete a sentence that verified only that claim then you should also delete the citation that verified that claim. If...
    53 KB (6,015 words) - 08:36, 3 July 2024
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)