Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Claudius Ptolemy

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 17:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The file's description could do with more detail such as the author and date. Though not contemporary, it is useful as far as later interpretations of Ptolemy go. I'm not sure if it's detailed enough though. Nev1 (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Will support if an improved description is introduced. -- bydand•talk 19:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added about him but I couldn't find the author and date. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 04:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ only because I don't think the size comes close to the full-size, which I'm not saying we need, but I think we can do better. --I'ḏ♥One 04:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Scratch my outright oppose because it does look good on the article. --I'ḏ♥One 07:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support or neutral? --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 10:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Neutral basically. --I'ḏ ♥One 01:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Elekhh (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]