Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 February 1

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 February 9. plicit 06:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 February 11. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

European League of Football season roster and staff templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use templates, only used at their respective team season pages. The names listed in the templates are almost entirely non-notable and the templates should be substituted into the main article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

substitute and delete the single-use ones. for the non-single-use ones, merge with the season article and use WP:LST to show on the main team page. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacing with {{title missing}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the documentation, "This is a (probably-temporary) template used by @BrownHairedGirl to track a set of references which are being improved." BHG was ArbCom banned last year, and even in normal circumstances this doesn't seem like the best use of a template. Additionally, it's not a very helpful template for tracking as it doesn't output a category in most cases or make anything appear on the article pages, so you have to know it exists to use it, and most of its uses are already tracked by Category:CS1 errors: bare URL. :Jay8g [VTE] 20:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was rename. to Template:Volunteer Response Team topicon 2. Primefac (talk) 13:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:OTRS topicon with Template:Volunteer Response Team topicon.
Template:Volunteer Response Team topicon exists and this could be merged with that as a optional icon choice as both templates do the same thing Isla🏳️‍⚧ 19:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No to the merge. The OTRS topicon should simply be deleted since WP:OTRS no longer exists, and hasn't for a while now. It doesn't improve or add anything to the VRT topicon. Atsme 💬 📧 21:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Template:OTRS topicon and also Template:OTRS topicon1 and Template:OTRS topicon2. Since the OTRS does not exist anymore, these are not helpful. Any user that is part of the Volunteer Response Team should use its template. Gonnym (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Merging doesn't make sense. Delete all and keep VRTS topicon only. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Rename as RTH suggests below. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The topicon was designed for my WP user page, and should not be merged. I have vision issues, and can see it quite easily. You are welcome to create whatever you want for your own user page, so can we please close this discussion? VRT has nothing to do with Wikipedia. VRT is a Wikimedia Foundation volunteer position, and I am not aware of any reason why a wmf VRT volunteer cannot use their own topicon design on their WP user pages. If you have a good reason that I cannot use it, I will stand corrected. Atsme 💬 📧 16:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mainly to get more opinions on delete vs rename.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This only has 2 entries, which is not much use for a template. LibStar (talk) 04:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.