Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Live PD map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Live PD timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Relates to Live PD. At one time there was a crazily detailed article containing these: List of departments and officers followed on Live PD that was WP:BLARed in 2020. Way too much detail. Nigej (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Prime ministers of Spain - First Republic graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused timeline. List of prime ministers of Spain#Timeline covers a longer period. There were other similar ones that have been deleted previously. Nigej (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Progestogens marketed for clinical or veterinary use (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused content already at Progestogen (medication)#Available forms so best deleted. Nigej (talk) 21:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Poverty Ratio in CD Blocks of South 24 Parganas district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article content that's been lying around for 5+ years. Relates to South 24 Parganas. Nigej (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. After the changes to Template:Regular star polygon stat table this has made the other two templates redundant. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Regular star polygon stat table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox wrapper. {{Odd star polygon stat table}}and {{Even star polygon stat table}} have replaced it. Nigej (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the three templates are almost identical. I think it might be just better to merge even and odd into this star template instead. A simple if statement checking for evenness or oddness can flip the single display difference between the even and odd templates. Both even and odd can redirect to this template instead. The wording of this template can be tweaked with adding a single word "star" to match the wording of the even and odd templates. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • MERGE even and odd templates into this template -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment why would we want to keep two almost identical templates (one line of text is different, by an additional clause) instead of just using a single template that handles both cases? Isn't this why we have "Infobox settlement" instead of "Infobox New England village", "Infobox Alaska borough", etc? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • While there's an emphasis on minimising the number of infoboxes, this isn't actually one, its a wrapper of one. Clearly what you say is true, it should be merged, but who's going to do it. Not sure that we can expect the closer to do that sort of thing. Nigej (talk) 06:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • For these three templates, it's a simple matter, I could do it. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • {{{{{{1}}}-sides}}} is passed as the number of sides, that determines if it uses the even or the odd infobox. {{#if:{{yesno|{{#expr:{{{{{{1}}}-sides}}} mod 2}}}}|odd handling|even handling}} should take care of it, without needing to mess with {{Regular polygon db}} that calls even and odd infoboxen, as long as redirects exist from the old template names. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Give me the go ahead, and I'll modify {{Regular star polygon stat table}}, then you or the closer will just need to redirect {{Odd star polygon stat table}} and {{Even star polygon stat table}} to it. (probably add {{R from merge}} to the redirects) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • You don't need any permission. If you think you can make an improvement, go ahead. Nigej (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
          • Ok, I've updated {{Regular star polygon stat table}} , it should work if we just redirect {{Odd star polygon stat table}} and {{Even star polygon stat table}} to it. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Redwing class minesweeper (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Redwing-class minesweeper redirects to Adjutant-class minesweeper which has its own {{Adjutant class minesweeper}}. Nigej (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• redirect to {{Adjutant class minesweeper}} -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm good with deleting it, the class is very confusing and I probably created the template before realizing that.Pennsy22 (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Irish Army Rank Insignia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Irish Defence Forces rank insignia covers the subject and doesn't use it. Nigej (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spanish Air Force officer rank insignia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template from 2008. {{Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/OF/Spain}} seems to be maintained. Nigej (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indonesian Premier Division Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. I think it relates to 2013 Indonesian Premier Division (LPIS) although the groupings are different. Was created pre-season so perhaps the format was changed later. All quite confusing, but doesn't serve a useful purpose it seems. Nigej (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There is a similar Template:Liga Indonesia Premier Division Teams which may have the same issues like this one. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 19:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I think this and the other template mentioned have both been replaced by {{Liga 2 (Indonesia)}}? Serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 19:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indonesia provinces colored (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused multi-colored version of {{Indonesia provinces labelled map}} which is used at Provinces of Indonesia. Nigej (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into {{Indonesia provinces labelled map}}; a simple switch can be used to swap out the map for the colourful one -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HART color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:HART lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:HART stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/HART left/TECO Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/HART right/TECO Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{s-line}} templates for Hillsborough Area Regional Transit; superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Hillsborough Area Regional Transit. Mackensen (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:JTA color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:JTA lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:JTA stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:JTA style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/JTA left/Northbank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/JTA left/Southbank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/JTA right/Northbank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/JTA right/Southbank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{s-line}} templates for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority; superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Jacksonville Transportation Authority. Mackensen (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 12. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wide_template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indonesia national football team results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused box with 2 links, 1 now red after Indonesia national football team results (1950–69) was deleted. Can't imagine any possible use. Nigej (talk) 11:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Template:Indonesia NFT results should be used instead. Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Template:Indonesia NFT results is the correct template (which has all the appropriate links). 10:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indian civil service academies and training institutes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. There's no parent article Indian civil service academies and training institutes which perhaps shows it's a disparate group of entries. Nigej (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that duplicates {{IISER}}. Nigej (talk) 11:11, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:INDvsAUS-21Nov18 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused scorecard of a cricket match covered here Indian cricket team in Australia in 2018–19 (1st T20I). Can't imagine we'd want to keep it. Nigej (talk) 11:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom, no need for this template. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we don't need templates for individual scorecards. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:IMDb TV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused duplicate of {{IMDB TV original programming}}. Appeared at {{U.S. network show templates}} but I've changed that to the other one. Nigej (talk) 10:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Duplicate created by the same editor. Gonnym (talk) 11:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Rhode Island county labeled map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map. See: List of counties in Rhode Island. Nigej (talk) 09:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article uses different maps. Gonnym (talk) 11:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't remember why I created it, so have no objection to deleting it. I made a copy in my userspace in case I ever want to figure out what I was doing. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Rhododendrites as the sole author of all significant content on the page, could you tag the page with {{db-g7}}? It'd be able to be deleted faster that way. Cheers, 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 18:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Done — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sandakan Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was used at Sandakan (federal constituency) but since removed. Nigej (talk) 09:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:47, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Port Dickson Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was used at Port Dickson (federal constituency) but since removed. Nigej (talk) 09:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:47, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Penang Island electoral constituencies labelled map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map with uninformative codes. Constituencies of Penang uses different maps. Nigej (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Constituencies of Penang uses a different map. Gonnym (talk) 11:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 12. Izno (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Taichung labelled map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

10-year-old unused map of Taichung in Taiwan. Presumably unfinished since half the links relate to Paraguay. Nigej (talk) 07:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 11:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template seems to be an exact copy of Template:Infobox television series, should we deleted or merge it? Vitaium (talk) 03:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst/delete No reason to create a new Infobox on such a general topic. I'm no expert in this area but there must be suitable alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete completely. No subst, no merge, and no redirect. This is using a non-standard "infobox" approach and is duplicating the already established template. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy draftify. Article created accidentally in wrong namespace. I'm not moving this to article-space based on caution; there's a notability tag on it and better safe than sorry. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 18:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Angsuman Kar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template seems like an article Vitaium (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or userfy. This is an article in the wrong namespace. Nigej (talk) 07:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Move to article space without leaving a redirect. Created in the wrong namespace. This does not need a TFD discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify No discussion needed for this actually. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Saint Joseph's Pumas bowl game navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:UNAM Pumas bowl game navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The navbox only has one link. That is not enough for it to be its own template. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 03:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NAVBOX being used for decoration. Clearly no use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 07:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One link is not enough....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:56, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Useless navbox, only contain 1 link and just for decorative purpose. Vitaium (talk) 04:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pointless as not enough blue links. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).