Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 23

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Shenzhen Metro/Tram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 23:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - if such articles are ever created, then we can think about having a template for the line. Richard⁰⁶¹² 00:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ohio Heritage Conference graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and broken Frietjes (talk) 19:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - borked and code shows no valuable content. Richard⁰⁶¹² 00:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NCAA Division I volleyball programs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

broken; should be deleted, fixed or moved to userspace for development. Frietjes (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless the creator wants it moved to userspace. Richard⁰⁶¹² 00:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1970–1979_Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:1980–1989_Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:1990–1999_Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2000–2009_Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2010–2019_Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SI_Swimsuit_Cover_Models (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1964–1969_Sports_Illustrated_Swimsuit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Playmates of 2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Playmates of 2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Playmates of 2013 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Playmates of 2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Playmates of 2017 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Playmates of 2018 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links point to the same article. Nothing to navigate. Pointless. --woodensuperman 13:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep 2017 now has two.Naraht (talk) 13:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  That's only one of the six navboxes, and it still does not meet the "rule of five" threshold per WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 13:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Not sure rule of five *directly* applies. All of these navboxes have 30 some good links to the other years. But the spirit does. I may withdraw my keep, let me think about it.Naraht (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  The links to the other years are in {{Playboy Playmates by year}} which should be used on the year lists. --woodensuperman 14:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Navboxes are not tables of contents. Delete per WP:NAV/WP:NAVBOX without prejudice to recreation if and only if at least half of the months can be filled with specific playmates. Template:Playboy Playmates by year exists to navigate between lists and can be added to as a start when separate playmates have separate articles. --Izno (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete until at least three or four playmates on any template have dedicated articles.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to navigate through list articles and categories. Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Playmates of 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless navbox. Other than Amanda Cerny, all links point to the same article, so navigation between playmates is not possible. --woodensuperman 13:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per #Playmates navboxes. --Izno (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete until at least three or four playmates on any template have dedicated articles.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to navigate through list articles and categories. Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Playmates of 2015 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless navbox. Other than Eugena Washington, all links point to the same article, so navigation between playmates is not possible. --woodensuperman 13:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per #Playmates navboxes. --Izno (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete until at least three or four playmates on any template have dedicated articles.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to navigate through list articles and categories. Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Speculative_paleoart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have accidentally created this template at wikipedia instead of wikimedia commons. PaleoGeekSquared (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).