Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nirelan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Nirelan

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Nirelan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Nirelan2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Random832(t c) 16:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Created (or, at least, first started editing, I don't know how to check account creation) shortly after User:Nirelan was blocked for four days for 3RR on Dave Winer. Immediately began making the same contentious edits to Dave Winer. Similar name.

More evidence Nirelan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and his two sock-puppet IPs 70.104.126.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 71.244.175.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) were blocked from editing Wikipedia for 96 hours. [1] Less than 12 hours after Ryulong blocked all three, Nirelan has registered yet another sockpuppet to continue vandalizing this article, Nirelan2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). betsythedevine 17:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nirelan2 has confessed to being a sock puppet. (please ignore his lawyering, i've addressed that in my response in the next revision)

Comments

I think this is highly obvious, but process is important. --Random832(t c) 16:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Nirelan2 has been indef blocked by Ryulong, and Nirelan has been blocked for 1 week for block evasion. No further action is required, so closing. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]