Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dmurawski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Dmurawski (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

71.193.87.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Jorotayahbl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Artichoke2020 (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Disruption to WP:AfD/DMurawski, pattern of editing to DMurawski, and this edit

Location

You know, 71.193.87.216 probably isn't DM in disguise, but I recommend they should meet up, seen as they come from the same town! Camillus 11:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• I do not know Jorotayahbl... but I have been communicating to dmurawski, just to ask him about stuff to improve the article. He hasn't told me anything to do... I'm NOT a puppet and the other person likely isn't 71.193.87.216 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 03:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I logged a RFCU case on this Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dmurawski. Unfortuantely it was declined due to privacy issues, and because the link between the people is "obvious". I believe that the IP user is DMurawski and have strong suspicions of Jorotayahbl. --Deadly∀ssassin 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from User:Shalom: It's pretty obvious that Dmurawski and the IP address are the same person. Aside from their shared interest in a single topic, they edited that topic on May 6 within five minutes of each other:

• Anon edits the article at 03:24
• Dmurawski edits the AFD at 03:29

Jorotayahbl has one edit to create the article in question. Absent other evidence, he should be blocked as a probable sock or meat puppet. If he makes a reasonable unblock request saying he's not the same person, I would be inclined to consider it, but the default assumption is that he's the same person. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

One week for master, indef for sock name, one month for sock IP. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]