Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


The Suix

The Suix (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

15 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Apart from the similarity of usernames, repeated creation of WooMoo and vandalism to Woo Woo. CU requested to look for other throwaway accounts that may have been created. Nthep (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


15 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating articles about the same subject; probably evading their indef block. 331dot (talk) 12:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

User creating same pages as master; variation of name 331dot (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Ditto 331dot (talk) 09:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Ditto 331dot (talk) 09:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

 Looks like a duck to me ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 17:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

"WOOMOO" spam [1] [2]. Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk assistance requested: I assume that this case and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix Five need to be merged.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If someone does merge, they might as well merge in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Statsuix as well. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done both. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Another one 331dot (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


19 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Seems to have used a variation of my name after I reverted some of their vandalism 331dot (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Adding 331døt, who is already blocked as a vandal-only account. --bonadea contributions talk 11:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


19 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

[3] Linguist Moi? Moi. 11:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • All accounts are already blocked, and any new accounts will be typically be blocked long before any action will take place due to SPI. Please report any other new accounts to WP:AIV. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


19 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

The first account listed is already blocked, and properly tagged and is just for here for reference. The other accounts are currently not blocked yet. Both accounts have recently vandalized 2.0 (film). Semi-protection on the article may be needed too. 2601:1C0:106:179B:4DC9:277:EC08:4F88 (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I don't think the unblocked ones are socks of The Suix, as the contributions aren't similar to theirs. They've just made disruptive edits (one vandalised, the other edited warred) to the same article. Linguist Moi? Moi. 20:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I've left the two unblocked accounts unblocked per Linguist111; seems unlikely they are The Suix. All others  Blocked and tagged, so closing.

20 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

This has reached stupid levels of socking. Requesting CU to put a stop to this via rangeblocks, if possible. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 12:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

 Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me 2607:FB90:A6E7:2AF3:0:B:823:C801 (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


21 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. Let's at least take a look at what proxies they're using and see if we can block them this time. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 22:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added Part of the reason gay and do not know of many colored birds. (talk · contribs), same "rats" summary as other accounts. Hairhorn (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added DoRD block open proxies, he is dead rat! (talk · contribs), which still needs to be tagged. 73.96.114.195 (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added Κωστας μπαλα (talk · contribs), which still needs to be tagged. 73.96.113.71 (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added Κωαλα and A small water fountain of car enclosure.. All are now tagged. Linguist Moi? Moi. 21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Linguist111: I've also found Yoayo (talk · contribs). Can you tag this one as well? Thanks. 2601:1C0:106:865F:C41F:CC65:8229:D991 (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@2601:1C0:106:865F:C41F:CC65:8229:D991:  Done Linguist Moi? Moi. 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

 Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 21:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


Here we go again... @KrakatoaKatie: Do you think you can get any more proxies blocked that they are using...? 2601:1C0:109:5CED:6C23:CBC3:5A59:6C5D (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC) 2601:1C0:109:5CED:6C23:CBC3:5A59:6C5D (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


26 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Not sure what their newfound obsession with Linguist111 is about, but  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. If a CU could please check the proxies that would be splendid. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

It's cause I've been tagging the socks! Time for me to stop. Linguist Moi? Moi. 22:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


27 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Just for the record. All already blocked. A CU can feel free to block proxies if they want. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

03 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Identical vandalism to Võ Nguyên Giáp. Diffs have been rev deleted, but it is clear from the page history. They are already blocked, but requesting checkuser to uncover additional accounts and see how User was able to keep creating accounts after account creation block. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is probably Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Suix. They edit through open proxies or something like that. Sro23 (talk) 00:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like an imposter who hates the original vandal; The Suix is a spammer and one of the usernames here is "We don't like spam"; "Us uck" is an obvious insult; "Open Proxy Problems" is less obvious, but "problems" should speak for itself; and "Inb4block" is 4chanese. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

08 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

 Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Also possible open proxies administrator would block them. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 21:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


09 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Gosh, this guy is socking fast! 200+ socks in 7 weeks! Even Supreme Genghis Khan didn't reach this many socks until about 4–5 months after he first registered. I think it may be time for a site ban and/or an LTA page. Linguist Moi? Moi. 20:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked users who no one is willing to unblock are de facto banned, though. And creating an LTA for this vandal would only be giving them the attention they want. Probably best to just RBI/report to AIV and hope they get bored of this eventually. Sro23 (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


11 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

 Looks like a duck to me ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 23:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/The_Suix/Archive&oldid=1091625716"