Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymondskie99/Archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Raymondskie99

Raymondskie99 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

11 February 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

When "Yournewsboy" deleted the message of Raymondskie99 in my talk page, I talked to Yournewsboy about it. He(Yournewsboy) replied with this statement: "lol i was the one who wrote that talk (message) i just removed it because the task is done or wrong user talk page..." However, it wasn't Yournewsboy who talked to me about it; it was Raymondskie99.

The statement was deleted but there is still an old revision right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yournewsboy&oldid=825073894

They also live in the same place, Davao City, and they have similar, if not the same, interest in topics relating to sea creatures. The Raymondskie99 account's activity involved deleting file deletion tags as well as uploading copyrighted images and copy pasting copyrighted content. All accounts do disruptive editing.

Yournewsboy also edited Raymondskie99's talk page, removing nearly all of the messages: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raymondskie99&action=history

Yournewsboy claims he forgot the password of his old account, even though the old account was still active, in the same day Yournewsboy edited the Mayon article, just three minutes right after Yournewsboy: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mayon&action=history Raymondskie99 just suddenly popped out too, just minutes after Yournewsboy's edit, without any other activity in the aforementioned article.Itsquietuptown (TalkContributions) 10:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. OK I admit I did mistake now I apologize just tell admin to ban me as a consequence. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yournewsboy (talkcontribs) 10:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment by Loopy30. I have been aware of multiple accounts since late January, as both edit the same articles and the user pages were at one time nearly identical (Raymondskie99 and Yournewsboy). User has been advised/warned on several occasions (diff 1, diff 2, diff 3, diff 4, diff 5, diff 6, diff 7, diff 8, diff 9) for disruptive editing. I assumed good faith at the time, but now user is using IP address and alternate account to vandalize articles (diff 1, diff 2, diff 3). Multiple warnings for copyright violations, unsourced edits and disruptive editing have been left at user talk page but WP:CIR and/or maturity of editor may be an issue. Loopy30 (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed + RespectWamen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki).  Blocked and tagged.  Clerk assistance requested: Please move to Raymondskie99, the oldest account.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


15 February 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

New account and new IP users made first edits immediately after previous username was banned following SPI. User on same pages (eg. List of critically endangered birds‎) and making same disruptive edits (copyvios diff, replacing RS facts with unsourced errors diff) Loopy30 (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed.  Blocked and tagged. I'm not closing in case someone wants to block the unblocked IP.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


12 March 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


As per WP:DUCK, edits show same disruptive editing patterns to fauna articles, especially list of endangered or extinct species:

  • User continues to add unlicensed images to birds and other fauna (diff 1)
  • User adds copyvios to articles (diff 1)
  • User continues to add unsourced changes to IUCN redlist ratings (diff 1)
  • User re-drafting previously deleted article that Raymondskie99 had edited (diff 1) Loopy30 (talk) 04:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Account already blocked, IP's look too stale to block, closing/archiving. Courcelles (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15 March 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

User continues with new IP address to edit same pages (bird fauna, species ratings pages) and adds further disruptive editing:

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Please refile if and when the IP is active again. Sro23 (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

IP 50.203.99.102 active since 01 Sep 2017 (start of school year with different IP range (USA vs. Philippines) but edits same topics (IUCN rating pages, birds, jellyfish, and other fauna). Warned and blocked multiple times, and is now adding unsourced speculation of future changes to IUCN ratings (diff 1, diff 2, diff 3) Loopy30 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP 49.148.241.113 is now active and editing bird pages by changing taxobox images, in some cases from photos to drawings (diff 3) and adding images of incorrect species (diff 4, diff 5, diff 6, diff 7, diff 8, diff 9, diff 10, and diff 11 - WP:CIR). Disruptive and block evasion. Loopy30 (talk) 02:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


23 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

User is active again now, continuing to add unsourced WP:OR (diff 1). Loopy30 (talk) 01:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also adding User:AmazingBiologist (who has commented below) as they have the same interest in editing jellyfish articles created by Raymondskie99. See diff 2 and diff 3 from 24 Apr, both redirects to a page that Raymondskie99 used the same (incorrect) image to illustrate. Loopy30 (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

the recently IP was from our college internet were the original one created that article the other one is the game article since we left our account still log in, the student who uses it abuses the Wikipedia's article and this account was created for re-creating the article and we created two accounts in a private IP Address means that we the former student can use it not the others, plus the person is Obsessed with the bird Species and vandalize. for more information read my user page, i explained itAmazing Biologist (talk) 06:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Rowrow yo Boat created now deleted Maui Wowee and Holy Cross College of Calinan. CU blocked April 22, 2018 as sock of Raymondskie99. Amazing Biologist recreated Maui Wowee and Holy Cross College of Calina. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed + De Lambord (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Blocked and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


26 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

New IP (122.55.51.150) mimics sock-master De la lombertie with copy-cat unsourced Sanfourche promotion (diff) but mobile phone is based in Philippines (Holy Cross College of Calinan). Loopy30 (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Just one edit and the ip is  Stale. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


01 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Identical recreation at Draft:Lemon-rumped tanager of Lemon-rumped tanager created by another Raymondskie99. Also a cross-over area of interest/editing in Holy Cross colleges in the Philippines Nthep (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


04 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

New IP from same location returns to edit same articles (diff 1 and diff 2) and restores Raymondskie's edits. Loopy30 (talk) 22:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



05 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

(nb. corrected to IP used 04/05 May, prev report transposed IPs with earlier report) New IP from same location returns to edit same articles (diff 1 and diff 2) and restores Raymondskie's edits. Loopy30 (talk) 00:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed IP to 49.148.154.14 on 05 May. Loopy30 (talk) 01:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocking individual IP's clearly isn't going to do much here, and a range block isn't possible without collateral damage. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


08 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Re-creation of deleted draft Draft:Maui Wowee‎ originally created by the sock User:Rowrow yo Boat and subsequently deleted as G5. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed + Spaceabon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


26 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of articles last socks created, such as Saints and Sinners Bingo and Omnideck 6, and same interest on video games, just like Personale, who is confirmed by CheckUser Bbb23 to Raymondskie99. Looks like to me obvious ducking, especially this sock's first edit was an article about a college in the Philippines, which basically adds a copyvio logo he uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding 49.148.226.240 by looking through the range contribs of 49.148.0.0/16. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All accounts are globally locked now, per the request here. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Actually, I'm creating this account to help article build up video games, I know I have done disrupting in the past on bird articles and they said to wait 6 months which it takes too long so I evade blocks, but didn't do anything disruptive. at least focus on this user Nipponese Dog Calvero — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hansonjay (talkcontribs) 04:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked per [1] SQLQuery me! 04:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • IP's now inactive. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP has only edited drafts that have been recently edited by User:Personale. Not requesting CheckUser as I understand that would identify the IP as the user, so reporting as a probable block evasion bassed on the WP:DUCKTEST KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk assistance requested: Please merge with or simply add to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymondskie99.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


31 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Possible ducking, once again writing draft articles and editing actual articles mostly related to video games, just like Personale, Hansonjay, and other IPs within the 49.1* range. He even has the same writing style as well when asking for help ([2]). Notice most of the drafts he has edited are usually non-notable, and have been repeatedly declined, and see how he improperly names his sources (it should be the actual title of the article source, but instead he usually names only websites, see deleted contribs between Personale (especially the article Saints and Sinners Bingo); and the IPs: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]).

For the full picture, see range contribs of 49.148.247.0/24. theinstantmatrix (talk) 12:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

plsss i was only helping their drafts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.148.247.198 (talk) 12:14, 31 May 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what your intention was. What is clear here is that you are evading your blocks, and is not allowed per policy, especially:

Evasion of sanctions: Sanctions apply to individual editors, not to accounts. Using a second account to edit in violation of an active block or community sanction will result in further sanctions, which may include removal of your contributions. See also WP:EVASION.

theinstantmatrix (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reporting myself this is the last day in helping the drafts, I'm very sorry for breaking the blocking evasion :(. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.148.251.253 (talk) 06:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The IP edits are too old. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


16 July 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Same kind of editing relating to video games, editing the related drafts (Draft:Cuisine Royale, Draft:Tuhala Witch Well), and messaging experienced users (and undoing them), indicating that Raymondskie99 had already known them during his socking episode.

The latest IP Raymondskie99 is editing from is 49.148.250.192; all others are stale and only here for the record. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The latest IP is now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


18 July 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Majority of this IP's contributions were removing problem tags without actually giving effort to fixing said problem, using the same edit summary "not anymore", which is also used in edits like [9] [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], and [16], sorted from oldest to newest. This time, he's now editing articles mostly related to the Philippines, China, and Singapore, which may make sense since he claims on Personale's user page that he's Chinese, but living in the Philippines. This message posted to WikiProject China's talk page is enough for me to convince that this is a WP:DUCK. theinstantmatrix (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • IP is now stale. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Same interest in video game articles, like Personale and Hansonjay, as he has expanded articles from redirects like Greninja, and Corrin (Fire Emblem); and same bad English as shown on previous reports. Also has a habit of removing his own comments such as [17] and [18], which are reverted. The latest IP is on the bottom. theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The IP range has been blocked. Sro23 (talk) 03:34, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


11 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

All WP:DUCK. Nearly all already blocked. Just listing useful reference for future. -- The1337gamer (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 November 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


User:FairlaneIsPangit is exhibiting very similar behaviour to all the socks I reported and were confirmed last month. They are:

  • creating a series of poor quality video game character articles
  • uploading new images new of video game characters
  • working on poor quality drafts
  • creating article on non-notable memes.

-- The1337gamer (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


04 July 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

A different sock Mayamaya7 created Yuzu (emulator). An IP then recreated in draft space. It was declined at AfC then worked on by a brand new account. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • No other account on the range, and on according to the CU log, it's on the wrong continent for this sock farm. no No comment with respect to IP address(es) TonyBallioni (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Insufficient evidence for a block. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09 July 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

This user, just like Raymondskie99 and their sockpuppets, creates articles about (non-notable) game characters. They add copyrighted content on pages (Max Caulfield, Delsin Rowe, and will check their other articles they created), just like previous socks of this user.

They also recreated an article previously deleted as G5 by Anthony Bradbury because it was created by a sock of Raymondskie99. Then tey also use the word "socks" despite being at Wikipedia for only 6 hours (seems like they aren't really new). So to sum up: same articles, also copyvios, and clearly more knowledgable than a new user would be. MrClog (talk) 12:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The user just started a huge vandalism tour. --MrClog (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: Alleged sock has been banned indef as WP:NOTHERE. --MrClog (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


28 December 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


Newly created SPA whose first 26 edits (added in a 30 min span) are all incorrect changes to existing sourced material that will need to be reverted. Some (maybe all) of the articles were previously edited by Raymondskie99 or his socks. Given their interest in birds and jellyfish and a user page stating that they hail from the Phillipines, this new user quacks loud and proud.

Compare:

Loopy30 (talk) 12:32, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


28 December 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


New SPA user reverting corrections made during cleanup of last sock. Compare:

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I think this may be User: My Royal Young or an impostor of him. --IanDBeacon (talk) 00:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments