Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rang HD/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Rang HD

Rang HD (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

06 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Suspected block evasion, and same user page promotion per their user page on aswiki. Their user page here was deleted under criteria U5. – 64andtim (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Attempted blanking of User:Kashyap Jyoti Bora per abuse logs Special:AbuseLog/36545601 and Special:AbuseLog/36545600 -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 07:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

21 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Usernames between accounts are similar, as well as the sock used an image that the master uploaded to Commons on a (now deleted) userpage. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 07:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All accounts are now blocked, one without tags. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk)
Seems to be a larger number of socks than thought. Check for sleepers, please. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 08:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edits) 08:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

All of these accounts are confirmed as socks via a Commons CU investigation.

The bottom three are not blocked on this project yet. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk note: @LemonSlushie: The account Bongaigaon Now is not blocked. Please, provide some evidence if you still think that account is a sockpuppet. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Merged case from WP:Sockpuppet investigations/KSHP8899. Spicy (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of these accounts except Bongaigaon Now have been blocked and/or locked, some as CU blocks. I did not run a check on Bongaigaon Now because they predate the master; their editing focus seems different; they were evidently not found in previous checks on this case despite editing concurrently; and they did not show up in my own, fairly extensive, checks. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Filing for the record and making it easier to request a global lock. Bbb23 (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked, tagged, global lock requested. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In going through RNG225's edits, I'm finding some very bizarre edits to other users' userpages. I'm having trouble sorting it all out, but I suspect that at least some of them are socks, so I've added them to the list and am requesting CU. I know that Shankardev Shishu Niketan, Rangia has 0 edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar username, once again targeting same pages as before. I caught them trying to overwrite Rangia City with the same content as at Rangiya, an article other socks have targeted, and noticed the pattern on other articles, including a similar hijack attempt at Rangia. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Username
Re-adding the same text at Draft:Rangia City (please see this version), Rangia City (please see this version) and Rangia (Please see this version) as previous socks have added at Rangiya, Kamrup, Assam (please see this version) and Rangiya {please see this version)
User:DECIF has been alternating edits at Khoirabari (a common sock target) with User:Rangian and IPs in the 2409:4065. range who have also edited Rangiya, Kamrup, Assam in conjunction with preivious socks Arjayay (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I only saw the previous report after posting mine, but have kept mine because of the additional suspect. - Arjayay (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Both are  Confirmed. No other accounts seen.  Blocked and tagged, Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 15:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Removed the redirect at Rangiya, Kamrup, Assam, because Rangiya is semi-protected, and recreated the same article as previously created by User:Jaklal
Hijacked the Rangia page, turning it from a disambiguation page to an article, (as previously done by User:Rangian and other socks) and then tried to cover their tracks
False pro-Rangiya claims at Kamrup district Arjayay (talk) 10:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Second edit [1] was to revert to his preferred version of Rangiya (if required, tell-tale details can be provided off-wiki) - the version before User:Spicy removed all of a previous sock-puppet's additions (despite his edit summary, it is not exactly the version by Plantdrew as can be seen by the number of bytes). All articles edited to date have been previously edited by earlier Rang HD sockpuppets as listed here - Arjayay (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CU says yes, blocked, lock requested. Spicy (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Pattern of edits on Rangiya Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Solely reverting to previous versions by last three socks Wiki Purpose (talk · contribs), মই অসমীয়া (talk · contribs) and Truefolder (talk · contribs) as clearly shown on user contributions page Arjayay (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

[2] Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 06:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested by Dennis Brown below and as per edit history - multiple revertions to edits by previous socks, e.g. [3] and [4] - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Surfunchy seems to be taking up were this obvious sock left off. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 08:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Came across these independently before seeing the filing - both  Confirmed to prior socks in this case and blocked as such. Closing. firefly ( t · c ) 17:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

26 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Same editing pattern. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Reversions to edits by previous socks 1) Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Repeatedly removing speedy deletion tags "G5. Creations by banned or blocked users" on article recreated by last sock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjayay (talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar behaviour and targets as other already blocked socks from the same farm, see DEVER SFG (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), NonRevert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) or Surfunchy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for example. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

[5] Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 09:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I'm off to bed, so don't want to make the block if I'm not around a bit afterwards, but the user page seems to indicate they aren't even trying to pretend they aren't Rang HD. My opinion is yes, and that a CU is probably wise given the history of multiple accounts. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just before you added Assam Now, I was already doing comps of contribs of them and was suspicious. I would add that the sockmaster Amanheheh337 is coming up as well. I haven't done the homework (no time at the moment), but wonder if they are related. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Thunder Now - recreating their usual preferred article at Rangia City (itself created by a previous sock) as the actual Rangiya article has Extended confirmed protection
Sevenstar Warrior - turning Bongaigaon Thermal Power Station into a redirect as has been done by two previous Rang HD socks Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hi, Arjayay,
No it is not a Sockpuppet of Rang HD Thunder Now (talk) 15:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CU has found Bongaigaon Now, he is restored older revision by sock in Bongaigaon, please check edit history of Bongaigaon Now 2409:4065:291:859:0:0:BC5:88B1 (talk) 07:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The IP reporting another editor is a Rang sock themselves - repeated recreation of Rangia City - Arjayay (talk) 10:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar edits as previous socks from the same farm at an already heavily targeted article: Bongaigaon. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Created Rangia Municipality Board - previous socks have created Rangia Municipal Board 5 times - this is an attempt to side-step that.
I have other evidence, which I can e-mail to admins, but the sockmaster checks this page, and has deleted and edited previous reports, so I don't want to explain "en-clair" as this will help them evade future detection. - Arjayay (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Confirmed to the socks from the 6 May case. Blocking. Fry Edt from the report above is  Likely - blocking both, requesting locks. Girth Summit (blether) 17:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14 June 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Already blocked and tagged, but they normally come in groups so it might be worth a check. Feel free to close if you think it's unnecessary. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rang_HD/Archive&oldid=1229227023"