Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quadrow/Archive

Quadrow (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Técnico (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

AN/I determined a topic ban for Técnico, in only a few days a new user appeared with the exact same agenda, caring about nothing else. Carl Fredrik ^talk 14:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC) Carl Fredrik ^talk 14:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Some edits regarding "Far-Right". Quadrow [1] [2]. Tecnico [3] [4] [5] . Power~enwiki (talk) 04:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In essence, all of Técnicos edits, and all of Quadrow's recent edits at Talk:Breitbart News — e.g. [6]. Carl Fredrik ^talk 19:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• They way in which he responds to each comment on Talk:Breitbart News is very much reminiscent of responses at WP:AN/I by Técnico. Carl Fredrik ^talk 20:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• See these snap-shots:
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Breitbart_News&oldid=788667586
  • Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive957#User:T.C3.A9cnico_.28moved_from_WP:AN.29

Carl Fredrik ^talk 21:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk note: Since Quadrow is actually the oldest account, I moved the case. GAB^gab 00:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @CFCF: Could you please provide diffs showing that these two accounts are arguing the same point of view or making the same argument. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: I don't understand the allegation, there seems to be some misstatement of facts here. Técnico was topic-banned, but Quadrow is a much older account. Q didn't start commenting on Breitbart until T's topic ban was a foregone conclusion (it wasn't enacted until several days later), T has not edited since but Q took up the cause against the "far-right" label after having not edited at all in nearly a year. Apparently recent news that the publication was ever so slightly moderating their notably extreme views caused their traditional audience to get all up in arms, and that corresponded with an uptick in a certain class of tendentious editors appealing against the far-right label on Breitbart's talk page. I suspect that Quadrow and Técnico are distinct editors who got caught up in that, but in light of the timeline of editing and the fact that Quadrow is evading a topic ban if the two accounts are related, this request is  Clerk endorsed. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  In progress - Katie^talk 11:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Unrelated. Katie^talk 11:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

• Closing with no action. Sro23 (talk) 00:50, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]